pricing

Why Apple changed its tune in Europe


picture-2.jpgThe news this morning that the European Commission has dropped its unfair pricing case against Apple (AAPL) raises the question about how the company got into this mess in the first place.

The issue stems from a basic discrepancy: British customers have been paying 79 pence per song on iTunes (about $1.63 in today's currency market) while the rest of Europe was paying .99 euros — roughly 20% less.

The British Office of Fair Trading filed a complaint with the European Commission, which in early April formally charged Apple and four music labels (EMI, Sony BMG, Universal and Warner Music Group) with anti-competitive pricing.

This was no laughing matter. According to Thompson Financial, the EC has the power to fine companies up to 10% of their annual worldwide turnover for breaching EU antitrust rules. (link)

An Apple spokesperson at the time made it clear that the company blamed its partners in the music industry:

"Apple has always wanted to operate a single, pan-European iTunes store, accessible by anyone from any member state. But we were advised by the music labels and publishers that there were certain legal limits to the rights they could grant us. We do not believe the company did anything to violate EU law, and we will continue to work with the EU to resolve this matter."

It's not quite that simple. Even when Apple cut that deal, back in May 2006, the company was under pressure from the music publishers to relax its one-price-fits-all policy and allow the labels to charge more for some content and less for other stuff — the very issue that has gummed up Apple's negotiations with Hollywood and the TV networks.

What twisted logic led to the county-by-country pricing scheme is still not clear, but Apple obviously went along with it — and found itself in the EC's crosshairs.

The problem went away today. The EC closed its case against Apple and the four music labels, and in return Apple agreed to equalize pricing across its European iTunes stores within six months.

Whether song prices in the U.K. will be going down or the rest of Europe's going up is not yet known

It's also too early to say whether the settlement is a sign new pricing flexibility in Cupertino. We should find out next week, when the terms of the rumored movie rental deals with Fox, Disney and possibly others are revealed.

CNNMoney.com Comment Policy: CNNMoney.com encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNNMoney.com may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNNMoney.com the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNNMoney.com Privacy Statement.
On Brainstorm's radar
CompanyPrice% Change
Kelly Services Inc 11.31 10.23%
Terex Corp 20.95 9.06%
Alcoa Inc 15.79 8.30%
BlueLinx Holdings Inc 3.35 7.37%
Dec 21 3:53pm ET †
IndexLast% Change
Dow Jones10,414.140.83%
Nasdaq2,237.661.17%
S&P 5001,114.051.05%
10yr97 16/32Yield: 3.67%
Dec 21 †
CompanyPrice% Change
LSI Corp 5.97 6.42%
SanDisk Corp 26.64 6.22%
Micron Technology Inc 9.29 5.75%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 9.52 5.19%
Dec 21 3:58pm ET †
* : Time reflects local markets trading time.† - Intraday data delayed 15 minutes for Nasdaq, and 20 minutes for other exchanges.• Disclaimer
Powered by WordPress.com VIP.