Analyst: Apple's Q1 will beat Street by $1.2 billion
Blogger-analyst Andy Zaky, whose earnings estimates for Apple (AAPL) this year have proved considerably more accurate than the professionals' (see here), is predicting "the mother of all earnings blowouts" when the Christmas quarter's results come in.
In a preliminary report published Monday on Seeking Alpha and his blog Bullish Cross, Zaky estimates that when Apple releases its fiscal 2009 Q1 results in January, it will report earnings of $1.96 per share on sales of $11.29 billion — significantly higher than the $1.44 EPS on $10.08 billion that the pros are currently modeling.
"That would be the largest revenue beat by any company I've ever seen," writes Zaky, who attributes the gap between his numbers and the Street's to "irrational bearish exuberance."
Shrugging off concerns about consumer spending this quarter, Zaky is calling for sales growth in all three of Apple main product lines:
- iPods: 22 million units (up from 11.05 million in Q4)
- Macs: 2.8 million (up from 2.61 million)
- iPhones: 8 million (up from 6.89 million)
Note that Zaky, as the name of his blog suggests, is bullish — and long — on Apple and tends to err on the side of optimism. His 2008 Q4 predictions overshot actual results for both iPhones (7.5m est. vs. 6.89m act.) and Macs (2.9m est. vs. 2.61m act.).
[Wall Street, by contrast, is betting that iPhone unit sales -- like geese -- will head south this winter. On Friday, Barclays Capital trimmed its Q1 estimate to 5 million iPhones from 6.2 million. (link)]
But even Zaky's Q1 sales estimate of $11.29 billion pales beside what he calls Apple's "real" sales and earnings. These are the adjusted — or non-GAAP — numbers that Apple released for the first time last quarter. They include deferred revenue from sales of iPhones — which by generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) are spread out over 24 months (see The day Apple released its iPhone revenue bomb).
When Zaky estimates Apple's earnings using non-GAAP numbers, the gap between the Street's "consensus" and his "reality" grows even wider. As the table below shows, Zaky is calling for non-GAAP sales of $15.22 billion and earnings of an astonishing $3.54 a share.
The only Wall Street analyst I've found who has projected non-GAAP earnings for this quarter is Piper Jaffray's Gene Munster. He has Apple earning $2.70 per share (non-GAAP) in Q1 on adjusted sales of $12.4 billion.
For Zaky's complete analysis — including bullish and bearish scenarios — see his full report at Bullish Cross here.
Apple's incredible shrinking iPod
Bullish Cross' Andy Zaky has been on a tear lately.
The blogger-analyst, whose predictions of Apple's (AAPL) quarterly earnings bested the pros for the second time this year (see here and here), is using the new adjusted revenue numbers Steve Jobs released last week to take a fresh look at every aspect of company's business.
Today he's looking at the iPod — the MP3 player that was once the main driver of Apple's growth, and which contributed more than 55% to its total sales revenue as recently as the first quarter of fiscal 2006.
But the days that Apple was driven by the iPod are over, he concludes in an article posted Sunday evening. When viewed using so-called non-GAAP* revenue numbers (i.e., including the revenue from iPhone sales that Apple has been hiding in subscription-based accounting), the iPod's contribution to Apple's quarterly salesĀ has shrunk from 55.6% in 2006 to 14.2% last quarter, as shown in Zaky's chart below:
One consequence of the iPod's diminishing role in Apple's business model is a lessening of the company's dependence on its first fiscal quarter — the one that includes revenue from the millions of iPods purchased as Christmas gifts. Notice in the following Zaky chart how the spike represented by Q1 sales in each of the last three years has been replaced by a spike in Q4 — the September quarter in which Apple released its iPhone revenue bomb.
*GAAP = Generally accepted accounting principles, by which Apple spread the revenue from iPhone and Apple TV sales over the life of the product rather than reporting it in the month the device was sold.





