As the launch of Windows 7 approaches, one executive ponders the relevance of the OS.

By Richard Muirhead, chairman and CEO, Tideway Systems

Muirhead argues that operating systems are evolving. Photo: Tideway

The perception is that operating systems are dying. In truth, they are evolving.

For years we’ve witnessed wars waged among major operating system vendors, with computer purchases hanging in the balance. Microsoft’s (MSFT) Windows was a household name for people who didn’t know what an operating system was, its popularity growing from the use of well-known, everyday applications such as Word, Excel and PowerPoint that other operating systems didn’t have.

Increasingly, that war is now over and irrelevant.  Users can access similar applications more cheaply, simply and wherever they are directly via their Web browser – whether it’s Google’s (GOOG) Chrome, Mozilla’s Firefox, Microsoft’s Internet Explorer or something else – leaving them little reason to care what operating system is supporting them.

Today’s winning sales pitch to the end is all about usability, flexibility and a complete solution.

So are operating systems dead? Not really. More

Mobile platforms VP Andy Rubin talks about Android, Chrome, and the smartphone.

The second Google (GOOG) phone in the U.S. had a showcase event last week in San Francisco, and afterward I sat down with Andy Rubin, vice president of mobile platforms at Google.

Rubin believes Google helps consumers

I asked him about Google’s vision for the Android smartphone operating system, whether the search giant is sending mixed messages by promoting both Android and its upcoming Chrome OS, and whether Android is really a good fit for netbooks. Below is an edited transcript:

Q. Android is open and free, so anyone can put it in their devices – phones, cars, washing machines, whatever. But what uses is Google actively encouraging? Are you just focused on smartphones, or are you trying to get it on other types of devices?

A. This is kind of where open source meets business. I encourage high-volume things. A million customers? Not that interesting. Ten million? Not that interesting, but heading in the right direction. A hundred million customers starts getting interesting. So what consumer products have the opportunity to affect 100 million, 200 million, 300 million customers? There aren’t that many. What’s the most successful consumer product on the planet? People used to say the DVD. It’s the cell phone. They’re everywhere. That’s why we focused on the cell phone first – it’s the biggest volume opportunity. More

There were several $10,000 prizes at stake — as well as some free mobile phones — but at the end of the three-day Pwn2Own smartphone hacking contest at the big CamSecWest conference in Vancouver, British Columbia, which closed on Friday, none of the devices had been cracked.

The contest, sponsored by 3Com’s (COMS) TippingPoint computer security division, pitted some of the world's sharpest hackers and computer security experts against five smartphones: an Apple (AAPL) iPhone, a Research in Motion (RIMM) BlackBerry and phones running on Google’s (GOOG) Android, Microsoft’s (MSFT) Windows Mobile and Nokia’s (NOK) Symbian operating systems.

Although the rules were relaxed each day to make hacking easier, the phones managed to withstand the few attempts that were made to "pwn" them — Internet-gamer slang meaning to conquer or gain ownership.

The Web browsers were not so lucky. In a separate contest, now in its third year, the security barriers of Apple's Safari, Mozilla's Firefox and Microsoft's Internet Explorer were breached in the first day — Safari's in less than 10 seconds using an exploit prepared before the contest. The latest version of Microsoft's Web browser — IE8 — fell even before the browser's official release. Only Google's Chrome survived day one. See here.

It's not clear why the smartphones did so well and the browsers so badly. It may be that the devices are too new to have been studied closely. "There's a lot we don't know yet about them," Charlie Miller, the man who cracked Safari so quickly, told CNet's Elinor Mills (link). In fact, there were very few attempts made. Tipping Point's twitter feed mentioned only two: one against a BlackBerry and another against a Nokia phone running Symbian.

But there's no question that smartphones are vulnerable to attack. SearchSecurity.com reports that during one conference presentation a team from Core Security Technologies, a Boston-based penetration testing company, demonstrated how to crack into the iPhone, Google Android and Windows Mobile devices using something called a simulated stack overflow vulnerability.

According to Alfredo Ortega, one of the Core researchers, the iPhone had the most security features, making it the most difficult to crack. Windows Mobile, he said, was the easiest to defeat. (link)

When it’s not running contests, TippingPoint operates its ZeroDay Initiative, in which it pays computer security specialists — also known as “white hat hackers” — a bounty for previously undiscovered vulnerabilities in return for a promise not to exploit them.

TippingPoint, in turn, notifies the vendor and simultaneously develops a patch that it offers to its security clients. Once the vendor has developed its own patch, TippingPoint and the vendor coordinate public disclosure. The researcher can either be given credit for the discovery or, if he or she prefers, remain anonymous.

See also: White hat hackers target the iPhone

Below the fold: the rules of the contest as posted on the CamSecWest website here.

More