Are operating systems a dying breed?
As the launch of Windows 7 approaches, one executive ponders the relevance of the OS.
By Richard Muirhead, chairman and CEO, Tideway Systems

Muirhead argues that operating systems are evolving. Photo: Tideway
The perception is that operating systems are dying. In truth, they are evolving.
For years we’ve witnessed wars waged among major operating system vendors, with computer purchases hanging in the balance. Microsoft’s (MSFT) Windows was a household name for people who didn’t know what an operating system was, its popularity growing from the use of well-known, everyday applications such as Word, Excel and PowerPoint that other operating systems didn’t have.
Increasingly, that war is now over and irrelevant. Users can access similar applications more cheaply, simply and wherever they are directly via their Web browser – whether it’s Google’s (GOOG) Chrome, Mozilla’s Firefox, Microsoft’s Internet Explorer or something else – leaving them little reason to care what operating system is supporting them.
Today’s winning sales pitch to the end is all about usability, flexibility and a complete solution.
So are operating systems dead? Not really.
Despite becoming nearly invisible to the end-user, the truth is that operating systems continue to evolve and specialize behind the scenes.
Operating system proliferation, commoditization – or both?
In fact, there are more opportunities than ever for their use. Mobile devices like smartphones, netbooks and e-readers are becoming ubiquitous, and consumer driven activities like Web 2.0 are forcing their way into the enterprise on the back of virtualization and cloud computing.
All of these technologies rely on operating systems to run and are driving their proliferation. The big difference today is that the choice of operating system is increasingly less and less important as end users continue to demand more integrated, complete solutions.
Google is one company that has recognized this trend and evolved its business model accordingly. The company offers numerous applications from Gmail to Google Docs and the Chrome browser. Earlier this year, Google launched a new operating system, also called Chrome, as the company’s “attempt to re-think what operating systems should be.”
The official announcement illustrates why operating systems need to be integrated and specialized; “the operating systems that browsers run on were designed in an era where there was no Web.” With the Chrome operating system supporting the Chrome browser, Google not only performs more efficiently, it’s delivering a more interwoven, complete solution.
Through the operating system’s quiet proliferation and marginalization within integrated solutions, it has become a commodity. Look no further than the virtualization space. Virtualization creates virtual solutions from physical solutions – the best-known example is in data centers, where virtualization software can allow a single server to do the work of many.
Suppliers of virtual solutions simply deploy their offerings using whatever operating system the vendor thinks supports the product best. This removes the choice from the customer almost 100% of the time.
Invisible to the customer
My company, Tideway, a software developer that helps companies optimize their complex IT systems, is a good example of this transition. We began by shipping a fully-integrated and tested physical machine, incorporating web server, app server, operating system, training videos, etc., serviced by our monthly updates. For the past year now, customers can also get our solution in a virtual form.
Probably the largest effect of the operating system’s evolution – both on businesses and consumers alike – is the endless possibilities for innovation. Web 2.0 has allowed end users to be more efficient and productive at decreased costs, with purchasing decisions based more and more on the packaged solution and end benefits. Sean Michael Kerner from Internetnews put it nicely saying, “Linux isn't as much about the operating system (though that's important) it's about all the things that Linux enables.”
It’s no surprise that we’re seeing this shift to highly-usable, integrated technology solutions – be it in mobile apps or enterprise software – that can scale efficiently and that can truly flex to accommodate innovation in a particular market. The operating system as we knew it is no more, but rather a proliferating and commoditizing technology that’s increasingly becoming integrated and specialized like Google Chrome.
And this is just the beginning…not the end.
Muirhead is chairman of Tidway Systems, a New York and London-based company that specializes in helping customers optimize their data centers and other complex information technology systems.
Well, the title was just too intriguing for me not to read. OS will stay forever and probably (with today's technology) can take over almost all of human jobs, if the system is set out right. I believe OS on computers have lots of potential but don't forget to look at smartphones (i.e. iPhone OS) as they are the future. If Apple starts improving the iPhone's OS (multitasking, for starters) then why should I use my PC when i can do it anywhere in my living room. google sniper
Thanks for your comments everyone. Jason from Raleigh NC makes a couple of accurate observations in my opinion. Indeed, the point of my article (once I had your attention…) was not so much to argue that OS's were going away…but that their power is shifting to more integrated solutions. For the client that is the likes of the Palm Pre or iPhone or a Macbook Pro. For the back end systems it is the various notions of the Cloud and its essential Automation. Totally integrated client-back end systems like iPod/iTunes can be even more compelling. The opposing force that is meant to maintain choice for the buyer and hence competition and innovation is that of open standards and interoperability. But that's a tussle that will not conclude one way or another anytime soon….
The demise of Microsoft Windows had been foretold since Netscape times. Netscape was suppose to have replaced Windows in all your desktops. Anyone using Netscape nowadays? Their offspring Fire Fox is just starting to catch up with Internet Explorer again. Microsoft, despite being a giant does know its stuff well and can be agile as the needs arises. Never underestimate Microsoft, it will outlive its competitors, whoever they may be.
I was at shock at first reading the title.
"Are operating systems a dying breed?" Short answer, no. Long answer, no.
An operating system is what your system (computer) uses to operate. Hence the name. Without one your expensive computer is nothing but a brick, a paper weight.
However, reading into the article adds some insight. It isn't questioning the need for an OS but the relevance of which one you are using. It is true that the increasing reliance, and desire for, browser based programs it begins to diminish the relevance of your OS of choice.
Take this very website for example. It loads just fine if you are using a linux machine, XP/Vista/7, or Mac OSX.
However, what's keeping this from happening are the main productivity programs, such as MS Office.
OS's will be around, but I think people will want to have more of a choice of what they get on their computers. Since MACs run of PC hardware the day they make the OS available to anyone, that will be the day that true innovation will start to happen. MS is so big that a gem like Ubuntu is only known to a handful of geeks like me. Its a shame. Windows 7 is a Vista service pack designed to give you XP again.
Even if you use online software, how are you going to access it without an os on something, a computer or maybe a brick with an os installed but a plain brick is not going to connect you to your online software. That is mostly a question of whether people will buy hard copies of software, not whether an os is not needed. Or am I missing something?
Google Wave takes this even closer to the ultimate online OS, with a completely integrated approach…
I think Operating systems are here to stay for awhile because of security. With the Sidekick incident that occurred recently people will be more protective of where they place their data. Not only that in the case that you don't have access to the internet for whatever reason it also means that you would be cut off from your documents or other files. The importance of operating systems may diminish but not anytime soon.



Hi Richard- enjoyed the article very much- popular discussion topic around the water cooler these days. Perhaps one thing to add is that while we're seeing the commoditization of operating systems to a greater degree, we're in a transition in which some of the traditional problems facing IT organizations such as software license compliance and information security actually intensify.
People will still choose the tools they want to get work done, whether their employer agrees with their choices…or can effectively comply with the law as a result…or not.
Seems that Tideway is well positioned to help- particularly as part of BMC. Welcome to the company.