<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How many new iPhones did AT&amp;T sell?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/07/03/how-many-new-iphones-did-att-sell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/07/03/how-many-new-iphones-did-att-sell/</link>
	<description>Fortune&#039;s tech team offers analysis and perspective on the world’s most important developments.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 03:43:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan,Kansas City, MO</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/07/03/how-many-new-iphones-did-att-sell/#comment-26626</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan,Kansas City, MO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 11:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/?p=8036#comment-26626</guid>
		<description>20 reasons to buy an iPhone 3GS:



1. 3GS has a 600 MHz CPU vs. the 3G&#039;s 412 MHz CPU.

2. 3GS processor has been optimized from 90nm to 65nm.

3. 3GS has double the quantity of L1 cache: 32KB up from 16KB.

4. 3GS has 256MB RAM vs. the 3G&#039;s 128MB RAM.

5. 3GS has OpenGL ES 2.0 vs. the 3G&#039;s OpenGL 1.1.

6. 3GS pipeline depth has been boosted to 13-stage from 8-stage.

7. 3GS has a PowerVR SGX graphics core which is far superior to the MBX in 3G.

8. 3GS has an average data speed of 1568Kbps vs. 3G&#039;s 1165Kbps data speed.

9. 3GS has a 19 sec. system bootup vs. the 3G&#039;s 48 sec. system bootup.

10. 3GS has a fingerprint resistant oleophobic coating.

11. 3GS has a warmer display tint for easier reading.

12. 3GS applications and games load and run 14% to 72% faster.

13. 3GS now supports up to DirectX 10.1.

14. An average web page load is 5-6 seconds faster than the 3G (yes, with same OS 3).

15. SunSpider Javascript speed benchmarks shows the 3GS at 16.7 ms vs. the 3G at 41.4 ms.

16. The 3GS performs page renders 21% faster than Palm Pre, and 122% faster than the 3G - bench by Anandtech.

17. 3GS shutdown time is shorter.

18. iPhone OS 3.0 is more optimized for the 3GS over the 3G.

19. 3GS now has video ability and a better camera. If you want pro pics, then go buy a Nikon D300 at 1600 bucks (and that doesn&#039;t include the lens). No one is expecting to take studio level pics with a phone.

20. The 3GS overall performance increase is has been clearly tested by Anandtech, ArsTechnica, and CNET. If you want better performance, then the 3GS is worth the upgrade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>20 reasons to buy an iPhone 3GS:</p>
<p>1. 3GS has a 600 MHz CPU vs. the 3G&#039;s 412 MHz CPU.</p>
<p>2. 3GS processor has been optimized from 90nm to 65nm.</p>
<p>3. 3GS has double the quantity of L1 cache: 32KB up from 16KB.</p>
<p>4. 3GS has 256MB RAM vs. the 3G&#039;s 128MB RAM.</p>
<p>5. 3GS has OpenGL ES 2.0 vs. the 3G&#039;s OpenGL 1.1.</p>
<p>6. 3GS pipeline depth has been boosted to 13-stage from 8-stage.</p>
<p>7. 3GS has a PowerVR SGX graphics core which is far superior to the MBX in 3G.</p>
<p>8. 3GS has an average data speed of 1568Kbps vs. 3G&#039;s 1165Kbps data speed.</p>
<p>9. 3GS has a 19 sec. system bootup vs. the 3G&#039;s 48 sec. system bootup.</p>
<p>10. 3GS has a fingerprint resistant oleophobic coating.</p>
<p>11. 3GS has a warmer display tint for easier reading.</p>
<p>12. 3GS applications and games load and run 14% to 72% faster.</p>
<p>13. 3GS now supports up to DirectX 10.1.</p>
<p>14. An average web page load is 5-6 seconds faster than the 3G (yes, with same OS 3).</p>
<p>15. SunSpider Javascript speed benchmarks shows the 3GS at 16.7 ms vs. the 3G at 41.4 ms.</p>
<p>16. The 3GS performs page renders 21% faster than Palm Pre, and 122% faster than the 3G &#8211; bench by Anandtech.</p>
<p>17. 3GS shutdown time is shorter.</p>
<p>18. iPhone OS 3.0 is more optimized for the 3GS over the 3G.</p>
<p>19. 3GS now has video ability and a better camera. If you want pro pics, then go buy a Nikon D300 at 1600 bucks (and that doesn&#039;t include the lens). No one is expecting to take studio level pics with a phone.</p>
<p>20. The 3GS overall performance increase is has been clearly tested by Anandtech, ArsTechnica, and CNET. If you want better performance, then the 3GS is worth the upgrade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: digiboysean, NY,NY</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/07/03/how-many-new-iphones-did-att-sell/#comment-26625</link>
		<dc:creator>digiboysean, NY,NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 01:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/?p=8036#comment-26625</guid>
		<description>Personally, I love the iPhone, but I don&#039;t own one. Why? The AT&amp;T folks were rude and not really willing to work here on Water St., NYC. We dropped our account with AT&amp;T and went back to T-Mobile. I got myself a G1. Though it&#039;s not as pretty and sleek as an iPhone, it does everything that I need it to do. That&#039;s the point no? I&#039;m sure the Pre does the same shit. I&#039;m a huge Apple guy, have several computers and don&#039;t even touch Windows...I used to build pc&#039;s. I know Windows. But I have drawn the line with Apple at points. Mobile Me...I have to spend a $100 a year for syncing my crap, and it failed at one point. I did get my $100 back. And the whole contract crap with AT&amp;T...though T-Mobile&#039;s got their crap too...with contracts. Apple should just sell the damn phone and you should be able to pick your carrier, since they all suck with something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I love the iPhone, but I don&#039;t own one. Why? The AT&amp;T folks were rude and not really willing to work here on Water St., NYC. We dropped our account with AT&amp;T and went back to T-Mobile. I got myself a G1. Though it&#039;s not as pretty and sleek as an iPhone, it does everything that I need it to do. That&#039;s the point no? I&#039;m sure the Pre does the same shit. I&#039;m a huge Apple guy, have several computers and don&#039;t even touch Windows&#8230;I used to build pc&#039;s. I know Windows. But I have drawn the line with Apple at points. Mobile Me&#8230;I have to spend a $100 a year for syncing my crap, and it failed at one point. I did get my $100 back. And the whole contract crap with AT&amp;T&#8230;though T-Mobile&#039;s got their crap too&#8230;with contracts. Apple should just sell the damn phone and you should be able to pick your carrier, since they all suck with something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon, Livingston, NJ</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/07/03/how-many-new-iphones-did-att-sell/#comment-26624</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon, Livingston, NJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 23:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/?p=8036#comment-26624</guid>
		<description>To the comment about &quot;other countries&quot; in Asia having better and cheaper choices than the iPhone, the #1 and #2 selling smart phones in Japan are the 8 gig and 16 gig iphone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the comment about &#034;other countries&#034; in Asia having better and cheaper choices than the iPhone, the #1 and #2 selling smart phones in Japan are the 8 gig and 16 gig iphone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan, Davis, CA</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/07/03/how-many-new-iphones-did-att-sell/#comment-26623</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan, Davis, CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 07:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/?p=8036#comment-26623</guid>
		<description>To the guy pumping the Nokia N97; the reviews of the N97 say its interface feels unresponsive due to the &quot;resistive&quot; touchscreen which requires you to apply pressure to the screen.  Reviewers often had to press 2 or 3 times to get it to register their touch.  On the other hand, modern smartphones (T-Mobile G1, Blackberry Storm, Palm Pre, Apple iPhone) have &quot;capactive&quot; touchscreens which respond to the slightest touch.



Also, people like to pick up and play with the devices before deciding whether to buy it (especially one as rare and obscure as the $700 N97).  Unless you live near a Nokia flagship store in Chicago or New York City, you&#039;ll have to buy it online.  This ensures that the N97 will NEVER become popular in America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the guy pumping the Nokia N97; the reviews of the N97 say its interface feels unresponsive due to the &#034;resistive&#034; touchscreen which requires you to apply pressure to the screen.  Reviewers often had to press 2 or 3 times to get it to register their touch.  On the other hand, modern smartphones (T-Mobile G1, Blackberry Storm, Palm Pre, Apple iPhone) have &#034;capactive&#034; touchscreens which respond to the slightest touch.</p>
<p>Also, people like to pick up and play with the devices before deciding whether to buy it (especially one as rare and obscure as the $700 N97).  Unless you live near a Nokia flagship store in Chicago or New York City, you&#039;ll have to buy it online.  This ensures that the N97 will NEVER become popular in America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jd, San Jose, CA</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/07/03/how-many-new-iphones-did-att-sell/#comment-26622</link>
		<dc:creator>Jd, San Jose, CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 06:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/?p=8036#comment-26622</guid>
		<description>Those that think Nokia is even in the same class of the iphone are in denial. Nokia is going down fast and furious. Their designs are fugly and stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those that think Nokia is even in the same class of the iphone are in denial. Nokia is going down fast and furious. Their designs are fugly and stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon,dearborn,mi</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/07/03/how-many-new-iphones-did-att-sell/#comment-26621</link>
		<dc:creator>jon,dearborn,mi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 01:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/?p=8036#comment-26621</guid>
		<description>The Nokia N97 is far better than any iphone out there. Just compare the specs and features and you&#039;ll quickly find that the iphone is nothing com pared to the Nokia N97. The Nokia is for people who can afford it.(It is a &quot;world&quot; phone after all).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Nokia N97 is far better than any iphone out there. Just compare the specs and features and you&#039;ll quickly find that the iphone is nothing com pared to the Nokia N97. The Nokia is for people who can afford it.(It is a &#034;world&#034; phone after all).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grover W, Denver CO</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/07/03/how-many-new-iphones-did-att-sell/#comment-26620</link>
		<dc:creator>Grover W, Denver CO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 17:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/?p=8036#comment-26620</guid>
		<description>There is simply nothing on the market more compelling than the iPhone, now in it&#039;s 3rd

generation. Apple set the smart phone World on fire, and the resulting competition is win for the consumer whether you iPhone or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is simply nothing on the market more compelling than the iPhone, now in it&#039;s 3rd</p>
<p>generation. Apple set the smart phone World on fire, and the resulting competition is win for the consumer whether you iPhone or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NT, Bkk TH</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/07/03/how-many-new-iphones-did-att-sell/#comment-26619</link>
		<dc:creator>NT, Bkk TH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 15:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/?p=8036#comment-26619</guid>
		<description>Just surprise to see all the comments whenever iphone topics appear on CNN.

In other countries like Japan, Korea, China and other countries in Asia, people can choose phone from many brands which is OK and a lot cheaper than iPhone. The price, interface and features is also good. Just open your eyes and see how other choices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just surprise to see all the comments whenever iphone topics appear on CNN.</p>
<p>In other countries like Japan, Korea, China and other countries in Asia, people can choose phone from many brands which is OK and a lot cheaper than iPhone. The price, interface and features is also good. Just open your eyes and see how other choices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thompson, Tucson, Arizona</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/07/03/how-many-new-iphones-did-att-sell/#comment-26618</link>
		<dc:creator>Thompson, Tucson, Arizona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 07:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/?p=8036#comment-26618</guid>
		<description>To Joe from Hoboken,



Android is going to do just about as well as Linux and open source, which is to say it will have its loyal fan-base amongst the pure geeks and it will survive due to the low cost of its business plans.  But it will NEVER take a large market share, because it takes real $$$ and vertical integration skills to drive the kind of innovation that has already taken place, and is about to accelerate, in the iPhone world.  Google has the dollars, but they won&#039;t invest enough of them in integration to send Android mainstream.  They are going to count on hardware vendors to try to make do with their API.  Apple has the advantage of making both hardware and software work together in harmony.



Astonishingly, because Google doesn&#039;t need Android to be a hit in order to survive, I predict that Android will emerge as the number two mobile computing platform, far behind iPhone OS.  Microsoft can survive with crap too, so they will likely persist.  Palm and RIM are going to be in trouble in this space within a few years.



Thompson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Joe from Hoboken,</p>
<p>Android is going to do just about as well as Linux and open source, which is to say it will have its loyal fan-base amongst the pure geeks and it will survive due to the low cost of its business plans.  But it will NEVER take a large market share, because it takes real $$$ and vertical integration skills to drive the kind of innovation that has already taken place, and is about to accelerate, in the iPhone world.  Google has the dollars, but they won&#039;t invest enough of them in integration to send Android mainstream.  They are going to count on hardware vendors to try to make do with their API.  Apple has the advantage of making both hardware and software work together in harmony.</p>
<p>Astonishingly, because Google doesn&#039;t need Android to be a hit in order to survive, I predict that Android will emerge as the number two mobile computing platform, far behind iPhone OS.  Microsoft can survive with crap too, so they will likely persist.  Palm and RIM are going to be in trouble in this space within a few years.</p>
<p>Thompson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamala, JAX, Florida</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/07/03/how-many-new-iphones-did-att-sell/#comment-26617</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamala, JAX, Florida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 06:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/?p=8036#comment-26617</guid>
		<description>Hows that 3G AT&amp;T service? From what I hear the coverage is spotty at best and non-existant for many. Anyone wanna post some figures on the ACTUAL speeds achieved? (how long to download files, loading a basic webpage, loading a webpage with many &#039;features&#039;).



Let&#039;s see some stats instead of just supporting whichever side of the argument you want to support without using any real data to compare.



ex ped: Wired did a pair of AT&amp;T 3G surveys. Here&#039;s a link to the most recent:



&lt;a href=&quot;http://gizmodo.com/5239323/take-wireds-3g-smartphone-speed-survey&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://gizmodo.com/5239323/take-wireds-3g-smartphone-speed-survey&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hows that 3G AT&amp;T service? From what I hear the coverage is spotty at best and non-existant for many. Anyone wanna post some figures on the ACTUAL speeds achieved? (how long to download files, loading a basic webpage, loading a webpage with many &#039;features&#039;).</p>
<p>Let&#039;s see some stats instead of just supporting whichever side of the argument you want to support without using any real data to compare.</p>
<p>ex ped: Wired did a pair of AT&amp;T 3G surveys. Here&#039;s a link to the most recent:</p>
<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5239323/take-wireds-3g-smartphone-speed-survey" rel="nofollow">http://gizmodo.com/5239323/take-wireds-3g-smartphone-speed-survey</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
