<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Analyst: &#039;Dramatically&#039; different Apple tablet in 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/05/21/analyst-dramatically-different-apple-tablet-in-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/05/21/analyst-dramatically-different-apple-tablet-in-2010/</link>
	<description>Fortune&#039;s tech team offers analysis and perspective on the world’s most important developments.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 03:43:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dennis, San Diego, CA</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/05/21/analyst-dramatically-different-apple-tablet-in-2010/#comment-36964</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis, San Diego, CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 05:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/?p=6836#comment-36964</guid>
		<description>Wow, i assume most comments written by real supper geeks (minority) who completely forgot about majority... :) i just don&#039;t get why people get pissed off about some speculation, in the end no one is telling you that you must buy it and no one really cares if you are going to buy it or not because most probably will without your opinion. I am most sure apple will come up with something that will surprise us all, something that will delight most and piss off some, there always gonna be haters and lovers but no reason to jump on each other with bunch of negativity and demands... Let&#039;s leave demands and decisions to to Steve J :) i think this product will be wonderful and at this point we can just speculate about features and details until we see the real thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, i assume most comments written by real supper geeks (minority) who completely forgot about majority&#8230; <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  i just don&#039;t get why people get pissed off about some speculation, in the end no one is telling you that you must buy it and no one really cares if you are going to buy it or not because most probably will without your opinion. I am most sure apple will come up with something that will surprise us all, something that will delight most and piss off some, there always gonna be haters and lovers but no reason to jump on each other with bunch of negativity and demands&#8230; Let&#039;s leave demands and decisions to to Steve J <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  i think this product will be wonderful and at this point we can just speculate about features and details until we see the real thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark, Anaheim, CA</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/05/21/analyst-dramatically-different-apple-tablet-in-2010/#comment-28131</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark, Anaheim, CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 19:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/?p=6836#comment-28131</guid>
		<description>::... that will be that for Apple...:::

Man, if I had a dollar for every time I heard this in the last 10 years....Oh, wait, I bought Apple stock at 15. I actually DO have a dollar for every time someone says that! Thanks for having no vision guys! It leaves the market open for someone with actual IDEAS other than &quot;more features at a cheaper price&quot; which will kill netbooks if anything will. The cheaper and crappier and less reliable and more complicated netbooks become, the shorter the lifespan will be for them. The PC world eats it&#039;s young, typically.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>::&#8230; that will be that for Apple&#8230;:::</p>
<p>Man, if I had a dollar for every time I heard this in the last 10 years&#8230;.Oh, wait, I bought Apple stock at 15. I actually DO have a dollar for every time someone says that! Thanks for having no vision guys! It leaves the market open for someone with actual IDEAS other than &#034;more features at a cheaper price&#034; which will kill netbooks if anything will. The cheaper and crappier and less reliable and more complicated netbooks become, the shorter the lifespan will be for them. The PC world eats it&#039;s young, typically.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler, Saint John, NB</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/05/21/analyst-dramatically-different-apple-tablet-in-2010/#comment-24944</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler, Saint John, NB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 12:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/?p=6836#comment-24944</guid>
		<description>&quot;I’m sure it will be a nice product, but it still won’t lure Windows PC users away. Those people that buy underpowered, third-world netbook devices are just too damn cheap to buy anything else that costs more. That’s why even medium-range priced notebook sales are suffering. Who would have thought Americans would have been scraping the bottom of the barrel when it comes to computing power.&quot;



Wow, quite a bit of ignorance on display there. Most people who buy netbooks don&#039;t buy them as a primary computer. They&#039;re usually a second or even third machine, so the argument that netbook users are &quot;too cheap to pay more&quot; is falacious.



Netbooks fill a very specific market. They&#039;re meant to be inexpensive and highly portable word processing, email, internet, etc. machines. Ditching a physical keyboard is a bad idea right off the bat since it&#039;s no longer well suited to the first two uses. If Apple sells a tablet with no physical keyboard (forget about having a peripheral. If it&#039;s full size then the portability compared to a netbook takes a nose dive), and less power then you&#039;re essentially left with a large iPhone you&#039;re paying as much as $700 for. The iPhone may be a great phone, but not at a $700 price point, even if it is bigger.



I have no doubt though, that if Apple does release such a tablet it will sell well to the Mac fans. They&#039;re generally not too bothered by paying more for less hardware wise so long as they never have to think about their machines inner workings and can take it to someone else to fix when something small goes wrong. But PC users, and those looking for functionality for their dollar are not going to be sold on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#034;I’m sure it will be a nice product, but it still won’t lure Windows PC users away. Those people that buy underpowered, third-world netbook devices are just too damn cheap to buy anything else that costs more. That’s why even medium-range priced notebook sales are suffering. Who would have thought Americans would have been scraping the bottom of the barrel when it comes to computing power.&#034;</p>
<p>Wow, quite a bit of ignorance on display there. Most people who buy netbooks don&#039;t buy them as a primary computer. They&#039;re usually a second or even third machine, so the argument that netbook users are &#034;too cheap to pay more&#034; is falacious.</p>
<p>Netbooks fill a very specific market. They&#039;re meant to be inexpensive and highly portable word processing, email, internet, etc. machines. Ditching a physical keyboard is a bad idea right off the bat since it&#039;s no longer well suited to the first two uses. If Apple sells a tablet with no physical keyboard (forget about having a peripheral. If it&#039;s full size then the portability compared to a netbook takes a nose dive), and less power then you&#039;re essentially left with a large iPhone you&#039;re paying as much as $700 for. The iPhone may be a great phone, but not at a $700 price point, even if it is bigger.</p>
<p>I have no doubt though, that if Apple does release such a tablet it will sell well to the Mac fans. They&#039;re generally not too bothered by paying more for less hardware wise so long as they never have to think about their machines inner workings and can take it to someone else to fix when something small goes wrong. But PC users, and those looking for functionality for their dollar are not going to be sold on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve, Denver, CO</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/05/21/analyst-dramatically-different-apple-tablet-in-2010/#comment-24943</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve, Denver, CO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 13:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/?p=6836#comment-24943</guid>
		<description>Dunno... a big, expensive tablet that will run small apps designed for a phone. So it may not run the real OS X. So you may not be able to add your own computer programs.



And Apple expects me to pay $500-$700 for it? In the words of some TV gangster... &quot;FUGGEDABOUTIT!!&quot;



For $500, I&#039;ll go for a netbook where I will be able to run Microsoft Office (which, BTW, Apple hasn&#039;t come up with anything better), and still have change left over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dunno&#8230; a big, expensive tablet that will run small apps designed for a phone. So it may not run the real OS X. So you may not be able to add your own computer programs.</p>
<p>And Apple expects me to pay $500-$700 for it? In the words of some TV gangster&#8230; &#034;FUGGEDABOUTIT!!&#034;</p>
<p>For $500, I&#039;ll go for a netbook where I will be able to run Microsoft Office (which, BTW, Apple hasn&#039;t come up with anything better), and still have change left over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob, SLO, CA</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/05/21/analyst-dramatically-different-apple-tablet-in-2010/#comment-24942</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob, SLO, CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 23:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/?p=6836#comment-24942</guid>
		<description>Noooooo ...



Its a small 10&quot; screen Mac with a laser scanned keyboard and a touch screen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noooooo &#8230;</p>
<p>Its a small 10&#034; screen Mac with a laser scanned keyboard and a touch screen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Gamble, LA, CA</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/05/21/analyst-dramatically-different-apple-tablet-in-2010/#comment-24941</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Gamble, LA, CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 20:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/?p=6836#comment-24941</guid>
		<description>MUST HAVE:



- 400 g weight or less. The less weight, the better. Hint: the MacBook Air is too heavy.

- Small. If possible, pocketable. 7-inch better than 10-inch. Hint: the MacBook Air is too large.

-Open and edit Keynote and PowerPoint NATIVE presentations.

- Full blown presentations on videoprojectors (VGA-out is a RE-MUST).



Remember: this device is NOT for heavy work on it, but mainly as a pocketable device for presentations and casual editing when you are rehearsing and reviewing your presentation. Check the first picture of:



Next Apple moves will be Books and Games…

http://spidouz.wordpress.com/2008/09/03/next-apple-moves-will-be-books-and-games



Can Apple deliver. We need thousands for our University. The price is not a problem. But we need it light and small.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MUST HAVE:</p>
<p>- 400 g weight or less. The less weight, the better. Hint: the MacBook Air is too heavy.</p>
<p>- Small. If possible, pocketable. 7-inch better than 10-inch. Hint: the MacBook Air is too large.</p>
<p>-Open and edit Keynote and PowerPoint NATIVE presentations.</p>
<p>- Full blown presentations on videoprojectors (VGA-out is a RE-MUST).</p>
<p>Remember: this device is NOT for heavy work on it, but mainly as a pocketable device for presentations and casual editing when you are rehearsing and reviewing your presentation. Check the first picture of:</p>
<p>Next Apple moves will be Books and Games…</p>
<p><a href="http://spidouz.wordpress.com/2008/09/03/next-apple-moves-will-be-books-and-games" rel="nofollow">http://spidouz.wordpress.com/2008/09/03/next-apple-moves-will-be-books-and-games</a></p>
<p>Can Apple deliver. We need thousands for our University. The price is not a problem. But we need it light and small.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iphonerulez, Brooklyn, New York</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/05/21/analyst-dramatically-different-apple-tablet-in-2010/#comment-24940</link>
		<dc:creator>iphonerulez, Brooklyn, New York</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 20:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/?p=6836#comment-24940</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure it will be a nice product, but it still won&#039;t lure Windows PC users away.  Those people that buy underpowered, third-world netbook devices are just too damn cheap to buy anything else that costs more.  That&#039;s why even medium-range priced notebook sales are suffering.  Who would have thought Americans would have been scraping the bottom of the barrel when it comes to computing power.



The only thing I&#039;m really worried about, that with all this advance notice, any company can easily upstage Apple with their own version of a tablet.  Those competitor companies will throw in the kitchen sink as far as features go and they&#039;ll sell it for even less than netbooks.  Apple&#039;s pad will be very low on hardware features, but high on usability and software, especially if it&#039;s going to be able to run all the iPhone/iPod platform software.  The other companies are going to have SDHC slots and fingerprint readers and probably USB ports.  The Apple tablet won&#039;t have any of that stuff.  Without a USB port, probably no corporation will want to use it, knowing how they love that standardized port stuff.



Apple is going to lose out big-time on this one if it waits until next year to release a tablet.  RIM will probably release one with it&#039;s famous BlackBerry chicklet keyboard and that will be that for Apple.  All the major corporations would go with the RIM tablet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m sure it will be a nice product, but it still won&#039;t lure Windows PC users away.  Those people that buy underpowered, third-world netbook devices are just too damn cheap to buy anything else that costs more.  That&#039;s why even medium-range priced notebook sales are suffering.  Who would have thought Americans would have been scraping the bottom of the barrel when it comes to computing power.</p>
<p>The only thing I&#039;m really worried about, that with all this advance notice, any company can easily upstage Apple with their own version of a tablet.  Those competitor companies will throw in the kitchen sink as far as features go and they&#039;ll sell it for even less than netbooks.  Apple&#039;s pad will be very low on hardware features, but high on usability and software, especially if it&#039;s going to be able to run all the iPhone/iPod platform software.  The other companies are going to have SDHC slots and fingerprint readers and probably USB ports.  The Apple tablet won&#039;t have any of that stuff.  Without a USB port, probably no corporation will want to use it, knowing how they love that standardized port stuff.</p>
<p>Apple is going to lose out big-time on this one if it waits until next year to release a tablet.  RIM will probably release one with it&#039;s famous BlackBerry chicklet keyboard and that will be that for Apple.  All the major corporations would go with the RIM tablet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joey,austin,tx</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/05/21/analyst-dramatically-different-apple-tablet-in-2010/#comment-24939</link>
		<dc:creator>joey,austin,tx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 17:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/?p=6836#comment-24939</guid>
		<description>What if you could get a multicore processor in an iphone?  One that can shutdown cores as needed, say when on battery vs plugged in.  How about an iphone that can plug into a larger tablet or a monitor as a docking station.  Think, my iphone is the central processor and docks with all these peripherals adding netbook/notebook and desktop functionality.  Remember, apple is syncing the look and feel across all platforms in OSX snow leopard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if you could get a multicore processor in an iphone?  One that can shutdown cores as needed, say when on battery vs plugged in.  How about an iphone that can plug into a larger tablet or a monitor as a docking station.  Think, my iphone is the central processor and docks with all these peripherals adding netbook/notebook and desktop functionality.  Remember, apple is syncing the look and feel across all platforms in OSX snow leopard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Sigal, SF, CA</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/05/21/analyst-dramatically-different-apple-tablet-in-2010/#comment-24938</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Sigal, SF, CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 17:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/?p=6836#comment-24938</guid>
		<description>While I think that this type of device has the potential to be a homerun, the projected timing (vs. this year) isn&#039;t shocking for two reasons:



1. Partitioning the platform between open PC-like layers (i.e., download apps from anywhere) and managed/closed runtime layers (App Store is THE marketplace with a singular SDK, APIs, etc.) is a potential hornet&#039;s nest of technical, user experience and ecosystem decisions.



2. Such a device is a logical point for Apple to define forking decisions between abstractions and uniformity, relative to supporting all sorts of different form factors under this platform (e.g., Macs, Apple TV, iPhone, iPod touch, Tablet, keyboard, touch/tilt only, camera, video, TV tuner).



For more fodder on the topic, check out the post:



Apple, TV and the Smart Connected Living Room

http://bit.ly/FBEk



Cheers,



Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I think that this type of device has the potential to be a homerun, the projected timing (vs. this year) isn&#039;t shocking for two reasons:</p>
<p>1. Partitioning the platform between open PC-like layers (i.e., download apps from anywhere) and managed/closed runtime layers (App Store is THE marketplace with a singular SDK, APIs, etc.) is a potential hornet&#039;s nest of technical, user experience and ecosystem decisions.</p>
<p>2. Such a device is a logical point for Apple to define forking decisions between abstractions and uniformity, relative to supporting all sorts of different form factors under this platform (e.g., Macs, Apple TV, iPhone, iPod touch, Tablet, keyboard, touch/tilt only, camera, video, TV tuner).</p>
<p>For more fodder on the topic, check out the post:</p>
<p>Apple, TV and the Smart Connected Living Room</p>
<p><a href="http://bit.ly/FBEk" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/FBEk</a></p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AK, ON, CA</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/05/21/analyst-dramatically-different-apple-tablet-in-2010/#comment-24937</link>
		<dc:creator>AK, ON, CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 16:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/?p=6836#comment-24937</guid>
		<description>The idea here would be to have a detachable dock type keyboard.

It would remain on your desk, so by plugging you tablet you get mini-laptop.

You could even carry it with you attached to the keyboard, if you feel the need.

But ultimately it would be a multi-touch tablet to my satisfaction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The idea here would be to have a detachable dock type keyboard.</p>
<p>It would remain on your desk, so by plugging you tablet you get mini-laptop.</p>
<p>You could even carry it with you attached to the keyboard, if you feel the need.</p>
<p>But ultimately it would be a multi-touch tablet to my satisfaction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
