Apple 2.0

Mac news from outside the reality distortion field

How Apple profits from the App Store


App Store billion celebrationWith the passing of the 1 billion download milestone, several efforts have been made to estimate what that means in dollar terms for Apple (AAPL).

They're well intentioned, but they miss the point.

The latest, published Wednesday by Lightspeed Venture Partner's Jeremy Liew, estimates that Apple, which takes 30 cents of every dollar spent on the App Store, has cleared somewhere between $20 million and $45 million since the store opened 10 months ago. Liew's calculation is based on the assumption that the ratio of free to paid apps is in the range of 15:1 to 40:1, and that the mean price per app is $2.65.

Three weeks earlier, Geek.com's Christian Zibreg performed a similar analysis using slightly different assumptions (notably a more optimistic 10:1 free-to-paid-app ratio) and calculated that Apple is currently collecting revenue at the rate of $300,000 a day — or $110 million a year. But he adds that the costs of running the store are unknown and could actually exceed Apple's share of the revenue.

Apple also collects revenue in the sale of iPhone developer licenses. As of March 17, Apple had signed up 50,000 individual and corporate developers. Individuals pay $99 for a license; enterprise memberships cost $299. Assuming that most developers pay $99, that's nearly $5 million billion in revenue for Apple.

But those membership fees are one-time-per-year payments, and they also have associated costs, including the cost of developing the SDK (software developers kit) and maintaining an extensive free library of guides, references, how-tos and sample code.

Even if there is money left over, and the sale of apps and developer licenses is generating a revenue stream for Apple, it's a trickle compared with the profits that are flooding in every quarter from what really matters to Cupertino: the sale of iPhones and iPod touches.

Apple booked $10.8 billion (non-GAAP) in fiscal 2008 from the sale of iPhones alone, and Piper Jaffray's Gene Munster estimates that it will book another $13 billion this year.

Steve Jobs said when he opened the App Store that it was designed to merely break even — and he probably meant it. The apps, which can increase the utility of a mobile device exponentially, are there to bring in users. The profit for Apple — as usual — is in the high-margin hardware.

See also:

Gameloft just reported that 13 percent of their revenues were from the iphone. this is equivalent to 23,800 per day just from one game shop.

Posted By Anonymous: November 21, 2009 10:03 AM

Analysts are so wrong about the earnings potential of apps. The IN APP model for gaming will be a big earnings boon to apple.

Ngmoco, the triailblazer, already has 20 million downloads. I bet there will be at least this many paying for IN APP gaming on adaily basis. Even if they spend a dollar a day, this is 20 million a day. To make it easier to compute, I wll use 21 million. 21 million multiplied by 300 days is 6.3 billion. Apple's share, 2.1 billion.

Posted By federic jose NY NY: November 21, 2009 9:58 AM

there are three key reasons why having a dominant standard builds winners. Exchange (think Facebook for one vs. Facebook for 200 million), complementary products & add- one that make your std more valuable, and switching costs created when customers invest in add-ons and are less likely to switch to rivals. IPhone wins big on 2 and 3! For more see network effects chapter at http://gallaugher.com/chapters

Posted By Gallaugher. Boston, MA: May 20, 2009 9:23 AM

Yup, Apple got me hooked because of the iPhone. Next thing I know, mobileme, new MacBook Pro marking my switch from PC land and now pretty much entrenched as a Mac user. Now looking at a Mac desktop in the future. Apple got good money for that initial iPhone purchase. And I doubt I'd switch phone platforms because of my apps! Switch carriers, now that's a different story… c'mon LTE and verizon! :)

Posted By Michael P., San Diego, CA: May 15, 2009 8:22 PM

http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-10013232-37.html

"Jobs on iPhone apps: $30 million in 30 days"

So that means Apple made $9 million in profit the first month alone. Even if you assume revenues stayed absolutely flat, that's $81 million in profit for the first 9 months, or more than double what the idiotic analysis by Lightspeed Venture did.

Someone needs to call them out – their flaw is pulling a paid apps to free apps ratio out of their asses.

Posted By Momo, San Francisco, CA: May 15, 2009 1:32 AM

Apple does not sell itunes songs and shows to make profit. It sell them to increase sales of ipod's and make HUGE profit. Similarly it sells the apps because it gives the people another reason to buy the iphone on which it again makes huge profits. Apple is first and last a hardware company. It sells songs and apps just to sell more hardware which is a well known fact now

Posted By Sidharth Dassani , Visakhapatnam , AP, India: May 14, 2009 2:54 PM

Isn't it great that we're still talking about Apple after all of these years! We need these guys to keep building great consumer products and raising the bar for everyone else (do you hear what I'm saying Microsoft?)

Posted By Dave, Winchester, VA: May 14, 2009 1:56 PM

The value of the apps goes way beyond attracting new users to the device, it's keeps these customers with Apple long term. Users quickly get 'platformed in' on the apple mobile world once they establish and pay for their favorite apps. This becomes more important as other devices catch up to Apple on the hardware side and the 'latest release leapfrog' begins to inevitably occur. The next big benefit is that they've once entered the Apple ecosystem, the magic dust gets sprinkled on them. From there, the halo appears as they buy their next desktop, laptop, MacPad (soon!), and future digital living room purchases all from Apple. It truly is a great strategy that will drive earnings well beyond the current purchase.

Posted By Ted Cranmore, Waterloo, ON: May 14, 2009 12:29 PM

"Steve Jobs said when he opened the App Store that it was designed to merely break even"

So no news here. End of discussion

Posted By AK, ON, CA: May 14, 2009 12:07 PM

IMHO, the App Store, the iPod, the iPhone, iTunes – all are principally designed as "bait" to attract new customers into those gorgeous Apple stores, where they come under the spell of those gorgeous computers.

THAT'S the method to Apple's madness!

Posted By Sacto Joe, Sacramento, CA: May 14, 2009 11:11 AM

Another advantage is attracting developers that then have less time or inclination to develop for another platform. Of course, alternate platform app stores can then compete by offering developers a bigger cut or better toolkit (good luck w/that), and suddenly, in a bad economy, there's competition for developers. Pretty cool for developers … like me.

Posted By Bill, Cherry Hill, NJ: May 14, 2009 10:43 AM

This information is interesting, but the true value of the App Store is so much greater than $45 million. To wit:

• The App Store gives Apple a huge competitive advantage in the marketplace. To measure the advantage, simply look at competitors' reactions to it. They're all scrambling to launch their own app outlets.

• The App Store adds significantly to the Apple ecosystem. Macs, iPhones and iPods work together … or separately.

• By working in concert with iTunes, the App Store builds Apple's music and movie businesses further.

• The App Store builds consumer recognition of Apple as a serious gaming option. With gaming a larger industry than movies, Apple is on the verge of disrupting, reshaping and controlling yet another industry.

Posted By rossor, Richmond, VA: May 14, 2009 10:27 AM

You have your ratios backwards. Free-to-paid would be in the ranges of 15:1, 40:1 and 10:1 according to the calculations cited in your article (not 1:15, 1:40 and 1:10).

ex ped: I believe you are right. I picked up the error from Lightspeed. Correcting now.

Posted By Paul, Falls Church, VA: May 14, 2009 10:20 AM

Errr… 50,000 times $99 is 5 million, not billion. So a lot less than Liew's estimate

Posted By Matt Paris France: May 14, 2009 9:48 AM

'In fact, Apple collects far more in the sale of developer licenses than it does from the sale of apps. As of March 17, Apple had signed up 50,000 individual and corporate developers. Individuals pay $99 for a license; enterprise memberships cost $299. Assume that most developers pay $99, that’s nearly $5 billion in revenue for Apple — more than 100 times Liew’s most optimistic estimate of its take from the App Store.'

I wish it were true, but 50,000 @ $99 is nearly $5 Million, not Billion.

Posted By Bob, Cincinnati, OH: May 14, 2009 9:46 AM

50,000 developers * $99 is only 5 million, and not 5 billion as the article states. It's also not a one time fee, I just paid my $99 for the second year. My App isn't very popular but it made WAY more than the $200 they collected in dev license fees.

Posted By gabor, Austin, TX: May 14, 2009 9:38 AM

Time for the Fortune editors to earn their keep. $99 x 50k is $4,950,000, not $5 billion.

Posted By Mathwiz, Lincoln, Nebraska: May 14, 2009 9:37 AM

I believe that the computation for developer fee revenue comes out to $5 Million, not $5 Billion!

Posted By Alan Rutan, Westwood, MA: May 14, 2009 9:35 AM

IS it clear that Developer licenses for the iPhone are one-time payments? The memberships (apparently) expire after a year — I don't know whether Apple plans on re-charging to renew or if expressing continued interest is sufficient to keep an account valid. No one's account has expired, yet.

Posted By Alan, Boston MA: May 14, 2009 9:35 AM

50,000 developers times $99 is roughly $5 million, not $5 billion. That changes things quite a bit.

Posted By Bob, Raleigh, NC: May 14, 2009 9:35 AM

I thought 50,000 times $99 was about $5M NOT $5B!!

ex ped: Right you are! And kudos for being the first to catch that error. I am a blogger of very little mind. Math fixed and post revised. Thanks.

Posted By Steve, Austin TX: May 14, 2009 9:33 AM
CNNMoney.com Comment Policy: CNNMoney.com encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNNMoney.com may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNNMoney.com the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNNMoney.com Privacy Statement.
Philip Elmer-DeWitt

Philip Elmer-DeWitt
Steve Jobs, goes the old joke at Apple, is surrounded by a reality distortion field; get too close and you might believe what he's saying. Apple has made believers out of millions of customers — and made a lot of investors rich — but Elmer-DeWitt believes that an ounce of skepticism never hurts when writing about the company. He should know. He's been covering Apple – and watching Steve Jobs operate — since 1982.
Subscribe to Apple 2.0: RSS feed | email newsletter
* : Time reflects local markets trading time.† - Intraday data delayed 15 minutes for Nasdaq, and 20 minutes for other exchanges.• Disclaimer
Powered by WordPress.com VIP.