Big Tech

Covering the digital giants

Cisco's server pitch


cisco-chambers-otellini
Cisco CEO John Chambers and Intel CEO Paul Otellini (center) are flanked by other Cisco executives as they explain how the two companies will work together on servers. Photo: Cisco
cisco-server
Cisco's new servers use more memory and faster I/O connections than mainstream competitors, and they come loaded with management software. Photo: Cisco

John Chambers is known for delivering Cisco's sales pitch like a revival preacher, complete with a country twang – and he summoned plenty of true believers Monday as he outlined Cisco's plans to bust into the $55 billion server market.

In the Cisco CEO's amen corner were no lesser lights than Intel (INTC) CEO Paul Otellini, VMware (VMW) CEO Paul Maritz, and EMC (EMC) CEO Joe Tucci – the top guys in chips, virtualization and storage. During a 90-minute online news conference that doubled as a showcase for Cisco's (CSCO) high-end teleconference system, that CEO chorus testified that Cisco's new "unified computing" gear is the real deal: By building more memory, faster data speeds and new management features into its boxes, Cisco might shake up the status quo in corporate data centers the way the iPod and iTunes did in digital music.

Why does the world need another server technology? In a word, virtualization. Even during this downturn, efficiency-hungry companies are embracing the technology, which cuts down capital costs by squeezing more work out of less computing equipment. (For example, a single server might act like three different virtual ones.) But today's servers can have trouble pulling off the virtualization trick; split one into several virtual pieces and it's likely to run low on memory and struggle to quickly access data. Managing virtual servers is a challenge, too – you can't kick a virtual machine, or check it to make sure the right lights are blinking.

Cisco claims its new servers address these problems. Each will hold more memory than servers from competitors like Hewlett-Packard (HPQ) and IBM (IBM), and they'll use faster and more reliable Ethernet connections to move data. A control panel from BMC Software (BMC) promises to make it easier to keep track of virtual machines – the next best thing to kicking them and checking the lights.

How much will it all cost? Cisco isn't saying yet, but it won't be cheap. The company isn't trying to play in the commodity blade server market; it's going to market this product to folks like large manufacturers, healthcare providers and data hosting companies who spend a lot on servers and software.

Even if Cisco's new hardware works as advertised, it won't take the market by storm overnight. To see why, consider Bryan Doerr, chief technology officer at data center provider Savvis (SVVS). Doerr is among the first customers to get his hands on Cisco's equipment; he's been testing it for three weeks. Though Doerr says the Cisco gear has been performing well in the lab, he hasn't yet thrown real work at it to prove it can scale, and he doesn't have a detailed timetable for rolling it out in significant volume.

And while Doerr believes Cisco's gear will help him do more work without having to add more people, he also says it won't dramatically slash his costs in the near-term. After all, even if he starts buying a lot of servers from Cisco, he'll still have to run the equipment he already owns. (For the record, he bought much of that equipment and management software from HP.)

Not that the established server vendors can be complacent. Doerr says Cisco's unified computing package is the most groundbreaking new idea he's seen in the data center in years, and it he's ready to open his wallet to get it. It's still early, but it sounds like in the server world, John Chambers is already winning converts.

Cisco is moving to a right direction and stealing market share to generate revenue. Server and Virtualization solution is a first step. Hopefully, Cisco launches more servers at the end of 2009.

Posted By Charles, San Jose, CA: April 15, 2009 2:06 PM

Lior,

You just don't understand do you

Posted By Rob Hosuton Texas: April 7, 2009 1:35 PM

Being in DataCenter business for about 15 years, I can tell there will be a dramatic shift in terms of viewing the DataCenter Architecture development – More knobs will be added and greater flexibility will be demanded. Agree, that Cisco servers may not penetrate immediately – but if they do prove to be what they are saying to be, then we should see a gradual transition to such complete solutions. No matter what happens, I am excited about this announcement and waiting for my management to approve the test deployment.

Posted By Michael Staver, New York, NY: March 18, 2009 1:31 PM

I would definitely trust a Cisco card over the rest due to their extensive experience and reliability.

They can't be faster than standards (Like 10Gb), but they will definitely use buffers and I/O queues more efficiently

Posted By Eugene, Irvine CA: March 17, 2009 7:35 PM

"faster I/O connections than mainstream competitors" ???

Really?

Maybe that's what Cisco says… all tier-1 and tier-2 server vendors can do 10GbE and Infiniband, and this has been around for the past 2-3 years, in servers and blades.

Cisco doesn't do faster I/O then their competitors.

Posted By Lior, New York, NY: March 17, 2009 6:04 PM
CNNMoney.com Comment Policy: CNNMoney.com encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNNMoney.com may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNNMoney.com the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNNMoney.com Privacy Statement.
Jon fortt

Jon Fortt
A senior writer for Fortune, Jon Fortt focuses on technology and innovation in Silicon Valley – a subject he's been reporting on since his days as a rookie reporter for the Lexington (Ky.) Herald-Leader. Before joining Fortune in 2007, Jon had reporting and editing stints at Business 2.0 magazine, and the San Jose (Calif.) Mercury News, Silicon Valley's hometown newspaper.
Subscribe to Big Tech: RSS feed | email newsletter
* : Time reflects local markets trading time.† - Intraday data delayed 15 minutes for Nasdaq, and 20 minutes for other exchanges.• Disclaimer
Powered by WordPress.com VIP.