<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marketing by spy shot: New Macs (with specs)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/03/03/apples-new-macs-marketing-by-spy-shot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/03/03/apples-new-macs-marketing-by-spy-shot/</link>
	<description>Fortune&#039;s tech team offers analysis and perspective on the world’s most important developments.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 03:43:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: R Brown, Finger Lakes, NY</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/03/03/apples-new-macs-marketing-by-spy-shot/#comment-20294</link>
		<dc:creator>R Brown, Finger Lakes, NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 17:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/?p=5044#comment-20294</guid>
		<description>It might be that the new product timing was determined by the Federal Communications Commission.



Among today&#039;s new product announcements were updated Time Capsule and AirPort Extreme hardware. These involve wireless communications and thus must have FCC approval. It was known that Apple had filed for FCC approval months ago; however, yesterday the FCC announced their approval.



So who set the approval announcement agenda - the FCC or Apple?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It might be that the new product timing was determined by the Federal Communications Commission.</p>
<p>Among today&#039;s new product announcements were updated Time Capsule and AirPort Extreme hardware. These involve wireless communications and thus must have FCC approval. It was known that Apple had filed for FCC approval months ago; however, yesterday the FCC announced their approval.</p>
<p>So who set the approval announcement agenda &#8211; the FCC or Apple?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R Brown, Finger Lakes, NY</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/03/03/apples-new-macs-marketing-by-spy-shot/#comment-20296</link>
		<dc:creator>R Brown, Finger Lakes, NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 17:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/?p=5044#comment-20296</guid>
		<description>It might be that the new product timing was determined by the Federal Communications Commission.



Among today&#039;s new product announcements were updated Time Capsule and AirPort Extreme hardware. These involve wireless communications and thus must have FCC approval. It was known that Apple had filed for FCC approval months ago; however, yesterday the FCC announced their approval.



So who set the approval announcement agenda - the FCC or Apple?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It might be that the new product timing was determined by the Federal Communications Commission.</p>
<p>Among today&#039;s new product announcements were updated Time Capsule and AirPort Extreme hardware. These involve wireless communications and thus must have FCC approval. It was known that Apple had filed for FCC approval months ago; however, yesterday the FCC announced their approval.</p>
<p>So who set the approval announcement agenda &#8211; the FCC or Apple?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cynik</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/03/03/apples-new-macs-marketing-by-spy-shot/#comment-20292</link>
		<dc:creator>cynik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 16:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/?p=5044#comment-20292</guid>
		<description>PED, it is a well written piece that covers much interesting ground.



But you so missed the scoop on this issue. I think we all understand that. And this isn&#039;t the first time.



If you want to stay at the pointy end of the cutting edge of journalism, you must lift your game.



I want to know about snow leopard server BEFORE it gets released.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PED, it is a well written piece that covers much interesting ground.</p>
<p>But you so missed the scoop on this issue. I think we all understand that. And this isn&#039;t the first time.</p>
<p>If you want to stay at the pointy end of the cutting edge of journalism, you must lift your game.</p>
<p>I want to know about snow leopard server BEFORE it gets released.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cynik</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/03/03/apples-new-macs-marketing-by-spy-shot/#comment-20295</link>
		<dc:creator>cynik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 16:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/?p=5044#comment-20295</guid>
		<description>PED, it is a well written piece that covers much interesting ground.



But you so missed the scoop on this issue. I think we all understand that. And this isn&#039;t the first time.



If you want to stay at the pointy end of the cutting edge of journalism, you must lift your game.



I want to know about snow leopard server BEFORE it gets released.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PED, it is a well written piece that covers much interesting ground.</p>
<p>But you so missed the scoop on this issue. I think we all understand that. And this isn&#039;t the first time.</p>
<p>If you want to stay at the pointy end of the cutting edge of journalism, you must lift your game.</p>
<p>I want to know about snow leopard server BEFORE it gets released.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sacto Joe, Sacramento, CA</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/03/03/apples-new-macs-marketing-by-spy-shot/#comment-20289</link>
		<dc:creator>Sacto Joe, Sacramento, CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 15:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/?p=5044#comment-20289</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m thinking it&#039;s time to retire the old IMac and get me one of those $600 minis.



It&#039;s hard to believe what I paid over $2400 for in 1984 dollars (albeit my first Mac included a monitor, a keyboard and a mouse) versus what I can now get for 1/4 the price in 2009 dollars - almost exactly 25 years later!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m thinking it&#039;s time to retire the old IMac and get me one of those $600 minis.</p>
<p>It&#039;s hard to believe what I paid over $2400 for in 1984 dollars (albeit my first Mac included a monitor, a keyboard and a mouse) versus what I can now get for 1/4 the price in 2009 dollars &#8211; almost exactly 25 years later!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sacto Joe, Sacramento, CA</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/03/03/apples-new-macs-marketing-by-spy-shot/#comment-20293</link>
		<dc:creator>Sacto Joe, Sacramento, CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 15:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/?p=5044#comment-20293</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m thinking it&#039;s time to retire the old IMac and get me one of those $600 minis.



It&#039;s hard to believe what I paid over $2400 for in 1984 dollars (albeit my first Mac included a monitor, a keyboard and a mouse) versus what I can now get for 1/4 the price in 2009 dollars - almost exactly 25 years later!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m thinking it&#039;s time to retire the old IMac and get me one of those $600 minis.</p>
<p>It&#039;s hard to believe what I paid over $2400 for in 1984 dollars (albeit my first Mac included a monitor, a keyboard and a mouse) versus what I can now get for 1/4 the price in 2009 dollars &#8211; almost exactly 25 years later!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil NY, NY</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/03/03/apples-new-macs-marketing-by-spy-shot/#comment-20288</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil NY, NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 14:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/?p=5044#comment-20288</guid>
		<description>PED, it looks like they just updated the Apple Store! They claim new iMacs, Power Macs, and yes, Mac minis.



$1500 for 24&quot; iMac 4GB memory, 640GB HD, GeForce 9400M and 2.66 CPU.



ex ped: Got it. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PED, it looks like they just updated the Apple Store! They claim new iMacs, Power Macs, and yes, Mac minis.</p>
<p>$1500 for 24&#034; iMac 4GB memory, 640GB HD, GeForce 9400M and 2.66 CPU.</p>
<p>ex ped: Got it. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil NY, NY</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/03/03/apples-new-macs-marketing-by-spy-shot/#comment-20291</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil NY, NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 14:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/?p=5044#comment-20291</guid>
		<description>PED, it looks like they just updated the Apple Store! They claim new iMacs, Power Macs, and yes, Mac minis.



$1500 for 24&quot; iMac 4GB memory, 640GB HD, GeForce 9400M and 2.66 CPU.



ex ped: Got it. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PED, it looks like they just updated the Apple Store! They claim new iMacs, Power Macs, and yes, Mac minis.</p>
<p>$1500 for 24&#034; iMac 4GB memory, 640GB HD, GeForce 9400M and 2.66 CPU.</p>
<p>ex ped: Got it. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Damjanovich Seymour, Ct</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/03/03/apples-new-macs-marketing-by-spy-shot/#comment-20287</link>
		<dc:creator>John Damjanovich Seymour, Ct</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 14:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/?p=5044#comment-20287</guid>
		<description>oops, should have posted your piece an hour ago.......it&#039;s already old news.



ex ped: An hour earlier it hadn&#039;t happened yet. We&#039;re on it now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops, should have posted your piece an hour ago&#8230;&#8230;.it&#039;s already old news.</p>
<p>ex ped: An hour earlier it hadn&#039;t happened yet. We&#039;re on it now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Damjanovich Seymour, Ct</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/03/03/apples-new-macs-marketing-by-spy-shot/#comment-20290</link>
		<dc:creator>John Damjanovich Seymour, Ct</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 14:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/?p=5044#comment-20290</guid>
		<description>oops, should have posted your piece an hour ago.......it&#039;s already old news.



ex ped: An hour earlier it hadn&#039;t happened yet. We&#039;re on it now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops, should have posted your piece an hour ago&#8230;&#8230;.it&#039;s already old news.</p>
<p>ex ped: An hour earlier it hadn&#039;t happened yet. We&#039;re on it now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
