<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tracking the iPhone&#039;s jagged growth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/01/13/tracking-the-iphones-jagged-growth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/01/13/tracking-the-iphones-jagged-growth/</link>
	<description>Fortune&#039;s tech team offers analysis and perspective on the world’s most important developments.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 01:57:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe, Austin, TX</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/01/13/tracking-the-iphones-jagged-growth/#comment-18423</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe, Austin, TX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/?p=3786#comment-18423</guid>
		<description>All this may be true world wide but I work for supporting the iphone and I can tell you the big surge of calls that was supposed to happen after Christmas didn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All this may be true world wide but I work for supporting the iphone and I can tell you the big surge of calls that was supposed to happen after Christmas didn&#039;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill, New York, New York</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/01/13/tracking-the-iphones-jagged-growth/#comment-18422</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill, New York, New York</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/?p=3786#comment-18422</guid>
		<description>On the &#039;shabby&#039; twist:



I would have written &quot;...they couldn&#039;t be too shabby&quot; or &quot;..shouldn&#039;t be too shabby.&quot; This would allow the sentence to speculate on the sales based upon the directions set in the past. As it is, the sentence is turning upon itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the &#039;shabby&#039; twist:</p>
<p>I would have written &#034;&#8230;they couldn&#039;t be too shabby&#034; or &#034;..shouldn&#039;t be too shabby.&#034; This would allow the sentence to speculate on the sales based upon the directions set in the past. As it is, the sentence is turning upon itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesus H. Christ</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/01/13/tracking-the-iphones-jagged-growth/#comment-18421</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesus H. Christ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/?p=3786#comment-18421</guid>
		<description>Jim...You&#039;re a grammar geek. Get a life!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim&#8230;You&#039;re a grammar geek. Get a life!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim, Stuttgart, Germany</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/01/13/tracking-the-iphones-jagged-growth/#comment-18420</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim, Stuttgart, Germany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/?p=3786#comment-18420</guid>
		<description>@Dusty: Read what PED is trying to say again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dusty: Read what PED is trying to say again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark / Scottsdale AZ</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/01/13/tracking-the-iphones-jagged-growth/#comment-18414</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark / Scottsdale AZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/?p=3786#comment-18414</guid>
		<description>I was there at the soho store with my platinum card in hand buying up the limit (2) in July of 2007. Used them til the G3 release and then decided - why upgrade?  I don&#039;t use half the features it has with G2!  Truth is that AT&amp;T isn&#039;t the greatest partner for service provision that they could have picked. Smarter move would have been a CDMA/GSM version for the US market and a GSM only version for the rest of the world. That way customers would have coverage regardless of AT&amp;T&#039;s spotty network and futile attempts to build outside of major metro markets.  There are millions of us who live and work outside the pathetic AT&amp;T footprint and for us - Verizon is the only logical US alternative.  And they have better service, cost a little more, and work a whole lot better, too!  I know GSM is the superior tech. But until CDMA is converted in the US - the CDMA network that Verizon offers is still far better and no one at Apple seems to be able to deal with that fact.  I guess Cupertino and the entire 280/101 strip from SF to Los Gatos to San Jose is covered well enough to convince Apple Execs that AT&amp;T would work. Pity, but it didn&#039;t do so  for the rest of the nation.  Anyone looking for two pristine iPhones should check my ad for them on ebay. I just want a phone that WORKS and sadly, that&#039;s let iPhone out of the running for much of the US.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was there at the soho store with my platinum card in hand buying up the limit (2) in July of 2007. Used them til the G3 release and then decided &#8211; why upgrade?  I don&#039;t use half the features it has with G2!  Truth is that AT&amp;T isn&#039;t the greatest partner for service provision that they could have picked. Smarter move would have been a CDMA/GSM version for the US market and a GSM only version for the rest of the world. That way customers would have coverage regardless of AT&amp;T&#039;s spotty network and futile attempts to build outside of major metro markets.  There are millions of us who live and work outside the pathetic AT&amp;T footprint and for us &#8211; Verizon is the only logical US alternative.  And they have better service, cost a little more, and work a whole lot better, too!  I know GSM is the superior tech. But until CDMA is converted in the US &#8211; the CDMA network that Verizon offers is still far better and no one at Apple seems to be able to deal with that fact.  I guess Cupertino and the entire 280/101 strip from SF to Los Gatos to San Jose is covered well enough to convince Apple Execs that AT&amp;T would work. Pity, but it didn&#039;t do so  for the rest of the nation.  Anyone looking for two pristine iPhones should check my ad for them on ebay. I just want a phone that WORKS and sadly, that&#039;s let iPhone out of the running for much of the US.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dusty, Milwaukee, WI</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/01/13/tracking-the-iphones-jagged-growth/#comment-18415</link>
		<dc:creator>Dusty, Milwaukee, WI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/?p=3786#comment-18415</guid>
		<description>@Jim: Actually, it was more correct in the first place. The verb of the coordinate first clause that maps to the &quot;they&quot; is in the past tense, &quot;sales were&quot;. If you want to fix it, you end up with the convoluted &quot;they won&#039;t have been too shabby.&quot;



Why pick on that and ignore: &quot;But on weekends, home users take over, and that include a higher percentage of Macs...&quot;?

&quot;That&quot; as a singular cannot be the subject of &quot;include&quot; but rather &quot;includes&quot;. The antecedent of &quot;that&quot; is &quot;home users&quot;, so we have to infer a word like &quot;group&quot; for them to match. One way to correct it would be: &quot;But on weekends, home users take over, and that group includes a higher percentage of Macs...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jim: Actually, it was more correct in the first place. The verb of the coordinate first clause that maps to the &#034;they&#034; is in the past tense, &#034;sales were&#034;. If you want to fix it, you end up with the convoluted &#034;they won&#039;t have been too shabby.&#034;</p>
<p>Why pick on that and ignore: &#034;But on weekends, home users take over, and that include a higher percentage of Macs&#8230;&#034;?</p>
<p>&#034;That&#034; as a singular cannot be the subject of &#034;include&#034; but rather &#034;includes&#034;. The antecedent of &#034;that&#034; is &#034;home users&#034;, so we have to infer a word like &#034;group&#034; for them to match. One way to correct it would be: &#034;But on weekends, home users take over, and that group includes a higher percentage of Macs&#8230;&#034;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose, Los Angeles, CA</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/01/13/tracking-the-iphones-jagged-growth/#comment-18416</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose, Los Angeles, CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/?p=3786#comment-18416</guid>
		<description>Aren&#039;t the spikes the times when Microsoft&#039;s managers are away and their workers don&#039;t have to fake it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aren&#039;t the spikes the times when Microsoft&#039;s managers are away and their workers don&#039;t have to fake it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buffeted, Berlin, Germany</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/01/13/tracking-the-iphones-jagged-growth/#comment-18417</link>
		<dc:creator>Buffeted, Berlin, Germany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/?p=3786#comment-18417</guid>
		<description>Well done! Including the links you added, one can put together a much more reliable picture than sketchy supply and build checks turned out recently which indicate nothing more than the usual stabilizing of inventory seen in previous years apple Q01 checks: There was never a point that there were less than 10 million iphones available to be sold in the Holiday quarter, for example. I&#039;m continually surpised at how many emails I recieve from new iphones - people who had never sent me emails from the device before Christmas 2008.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done! Including the links you added, one can put together a much more reliable picture than sketchy supply and build checks turned out recently which indicate nothing more than the usual stabilizing of inventory seen in previous years apple Q01 checks: There was never a point that there were less than 10 million iphones available to be sold in the Holiday quarter, for example. I&#039;m continually surpised at how many emails I recieve from new iphones &#8211; people who had never sent me emails from the device before Christmas 2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim, Stuttgart, Germany</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/01/13/tracking-the-iphones-jagged-growth/#comment-18418</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim, Stuttgart, Germany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/?p=3786#comment-18418</guid>
		<description>Change:

&gt;&gt;We won’t know how strong sales were in December until Apple (AAPL) releases its quarterly earnings next week (Jan. 21 at 5 p.m. EST), but based on the magnitude of that last bump, they weren’t too shabby.&lt;&lt;



to:



they won&#039;t be too shabby

or

they wouldn&#039;t be too shabby

or

they shouldn&#039;t be too shabby





You choose, but don&#039;t leave it like it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Change:</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;We won’t know how strong sales were in December until Apple (AAPL) releases its quarterly earnings next week (Jan. 21 at 5 p.m. EST), but based on the magnitude of that last bump, they weren’t too shabby.&lt;&lt;</p>
<p>to:</p>
<p>they won&#039;t be too shabby</p>
<p>or</p>
<p>they wouldn&#039;t be too shabby</p>
<p>or</p>
<p>they shouldn&#039;t be too shabby</p>
<p>You choose, but don&#039;t leave it like it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian, Hayward, CA</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/01/13/tracking-the-iphones-jagged-growth/#comment-18419</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian, Hayward, CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/?p=3786#comment-18419</guid>
		<description>Does Net Applications distinguish between iPhone hits and iPod Touch hits?



ex ped: yes, it reports touch separately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does Net Applications distinguish between iPhone hits and iPod Touch hits?</p>
<p>ex ped: yes, it reports touch separately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
