<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The case for a netbook at Macworld</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/12/16/the-case-for-a-nebook-at-macworld/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/12/16/the-case-for-a-nebook-at-macworld/</link>
	<description>Fortune&#039;s tech team offers analysis and perspective on the world’s most important developments.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 03:43:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David london uk</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/12/16/the-case-for-a-nebook-at-macworld/#comment-17593</link>
		<dc:creator>David london uk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 13:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/?p=3254#comment-17593</guid>
		<description>recently view comment by asian user



2009 recently view comment by asian user







We are offering these mobile phones for sale.



Blackberry Storm

Blackberry Thunder

Blackberry Bold

Blackberry pearl

Iphone 3G(unlocked version)

Samsung omnia i900

Sony Ericsson Xperia x1

Nokia n95

Nokia n96

HTC Touch Diamond

Imate



And others.



For booking and enquiry,please contact us directly via Email:David_forlife147@yahoo.com

Regards

David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>recently view comment by asian user</p>
<p>2009 recently view comment by asian user</p>
<p>We are offering these mobile phones for sale.</p>
<p>Blackberry Storm</p>
<p>Blackberry Thunder</p>
<p>Blackberry Bold</p>
<p>Blackberry pearl</p>
<p>Iphone 3G(unlocked version)</p>
<p>Samsung omnia i900</p>
<p>Sony Ericsson Xperia x1</p>
<p>Nokia n95</p>
<p>Nokia n96</p>
<p>HTC Touch Diamond</p>
<p>Imate</p>
<p>And others.</p>
<p>For booking and enquiry,please contact us directly via Email:David_forlife147@yahoo.com</p>
<p>Regards</p>
<p>David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray, TX</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/12/16/the-case-for-a-nebook-at-macworld/#comment-17592</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray, TX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 23:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/?p=3254#comment-17592</guid>
		<description>There is some truth to captbilly&#039;s statements.  Apple has not developed &quot;revolutionary&quot; technology.  What Apple is good at doing is developing products that captivate the public.  I&#039;m sure that there are phones that are much more capable than the iPhone, but they&#039;re not iPhones.



It really comes down to preference.  Do you prefer pure function, or the art and form of performing that function.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is some truth to captbilly&#039;s statements.  Apple has not developed &#034;revolutionary&#034; technology.  What Apple is good at doing is developing products that captivate the public.  I&#039;m sure that there are phones that are much more capable than the iPhone, but they&#039;re not iPhones.</p>
<p>It really comes down to preference.  Do you prefer pure function, or the art and form of performing that function.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Meade, Denver, CO</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/12/16/the-case-for-a-nebook-at-macworld/#comment-17591</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Meade, Denver, CO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 01:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/?p=3254#comment-17591</guid>
		<description>captbilly: &quot;My son could do more on the cell phone he got a year before the Iphone was released then he could on the Iphone&quot;



Like what, for example?   I can&#039;t think of anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>captbilly: &#034;My son could do more on the cell phone he got a year before the Iphone was released then he could on the Iphone&#034;</p>
<p>Like what, for example?   I can&#039;t think of anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple IT, LV NV</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/12/16/the-case-for-a-nebook-at-macworld/#comment-17590</link>
		<dc:creator>Apple IT, LV NV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/?p=3254#comment-17590</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;…as an engineer I do understand that none of their products are in any way revolutionary.&lt;/i&gt;



captbilly = clueless</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>…as an engineer I do understand that none of their products are in any way revolutionary.</i></p>
<p>captbilly = clueless</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: captbilly, Sacramento, CA</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/12/16/the-case-for-a-nebook-at-macworld/#comment-17589</link>
		<dc:creator>captbilly, Sacramento, CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 22:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/?p=3254#comment-17589</guid>
		<description>I wish I could get all the free advertising I want every time I came out with a new product.  I have nothing against Apple, but as an engineer I do understand that none of their products are in any way revolutionary.  In most cases (Ipod, Iphone, computers) there were as good or better products available before the Apple product was developed.  My son could do more on the cell phone he got a year before the Iphone was released then he could on the Iphone he finally bought and quickly sold a year later.



What is it about the media and Apple?  Is there something about how the products look that causes people to simply ignore the underlying technology?  Again, I am not saying that I dislike Apple products, they are fine, it&#039;s just that they are not good enough to justify all the hoopla that seems to ensue every time they come out with their latest stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish I could get all the free advertising I want every time I came out with a new product.  I have nothing against Apple, but as an engineer I do understand that none of their products are in any way revolutionary.  In most cases (Ipod, Iphone, computers) there were as good or better products available before the Apple product was developed.  My son could do more on the cell phone he got a year before the Iphone was released then he could on the Iphone he finally bought and quickly sold a year later.</p>
<p>What is it about the media and Apple?  Is there something about how the products look that causes people to simply ignore the underlying technology?  Again, I am not saying that I dislike Apple products, they are fine, it&#039;s just that they are not good enough to justify all the hoopla that seems to ensue every time they come out with their latest stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/12/16/the-case-for-a-nebook-at-macworld/#comment-17588</link>
		<dc:creator>Free</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 21:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/?p=3254#comment-17588</guid>
		<description>@jimmx - your comment is nonsense! Apple does not need to come in lower at a $449. Where do you get this crap? Apple always has a great value proposition that allows it to charge more - that is superior OS, features, reliability, ease of use, etc. etc. They DO NOT need to race to the bottom like the other fools out there are doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@jimmx &#8211; your comment is nonsense! Apple does not need to come in lower at a $449. Where do you get this crap? Apple always has a great value proposition that allows it to charge more &#8211; that is superior OS, features, reliability, ease of use, etc. etc. They DO NOT need to race to the bottom like the other fools out there are doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rita Flangler, NYC, NY</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/12/16/the-case-for-a-nebook-at-macworld/#comment-17587</link>
		<dc:creator>Rita Flangler, NYC, NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 21:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/?p=3254#comment-17587</guid>
		<description>&quot;I made it up&quot; describes the entire idiot-blogger universe. Any journalist, blogger, commentator, pundit, who&#039;s assertions don&#039;t have big cash on the line are garbage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#034;I made it up&#034; describes the entire idiot-blogger universe. Any journalist, blogger, commentator, pundit, who&#039;s assertions don&#039;t have big cash on the line are garbage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob, Johns Creek, GA</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/12/16/the-case-for-a-nebook-at-macworld/#comment-17586</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob, Johns Creek, GA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 20:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/?p=3254#comment-17586</guid>
		<description>It sounds like a netbook version of the ipod touch with slightly expanded capabilities. That&#039;s not a far stretch, and the $599 price could be justified if the device has a touchscreen and/or 32GB flashdrive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds like a netbook version of the ipod touch with slightly expanded capabilities. That&#039;s not a far stretch, and the $599 price could be justified if the device has a touchscreen and/or 32GB flashdrive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jmmx - Portland OR</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/12/16/the-case-for-a-nebook-at-macworld/#comment-17585</link>
		<dc:creator>jmmx - Portland OR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 20:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/?p=3254#comment-17585</guid>
		<description>Hooie!



At $599 it both fails to compete with the netbooks, and would be cannibalized by the bottom end MacBook at $999.



Needs a price point of $449. If they can make a Touch @$229, they can make a Touch Grande - 6 to 9 inch screen - for $449. That is still far above the base price for Linux netbooks.



But I think they will have a scaled down version of Snow Leopard in there. Probably running on their own chips w/ Nvidia integrated gpu (maybe they will license the gpu design and build it into their chip.)



The argument in favor of a netbook is that they need to. The netbooks are currently the most popular items in Amazon. But they need to get in where they can compete, and starting at 2X price point is too high.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hooie!</p>
<p>At $599 it both fails to compete with the netbooks, and would be cannibalized by the bottom end MacBook at $999.</p>
<p>Needs a price point of $449. If they can make a Touch @$229, they can make a Touch Grande &#8211; 6 to 9 inch screen &#8211; for $449. That is still far above the base price for Linux netbooks.</p>
<p>But I think they will have a scaled down version of Snow Leopard in there. Probably running on their own chips w/ Nvidia integrated gpu (maybe they will license the gpu design and build it into their chip.)</p>
<p>The argument in favor of a netbook is that they need to. The netbooks are currently the most popular items in Amazon. But they need to get in where they can compete, and starting at 2X price point is too high.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Small, Houston</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/12/16/the-case-for-a-nebook-at-macworld/#comment-17584</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Small, Houston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 20:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/?p=3254#comment-17584</guid>
		<description>That sort of product makes even more sense if there is a companion product with a phone and 3G connectivity included.



Apple hit a home run when they brought out the iPod Touch. By sharing parts and engineering with the iPhone they had two products with shared costs and many similar features.



I agree that the $699 NetBook is a logical product for Apple to introduce.  I can also envision a different version with a slot for stowing a Bluetooth Headset, 3G Connectivity, and iPhone functionality. This version would be sold as an alternative to the iPhone with real computer capabilities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That sort of product makes even more sense if there is a companion product with a phone and 3G connectivity included.</p>
<p>Apple hit a home run when they brought out the iPod Touch. By sharing parts and engineering with the iPhone they had two products with shared costs and many similar features.</p>
<p>I agree that the $699 NetBook is a logical product for Apple to introduce.  I can also envision a different version with a slot for stowing a Bluetooth Headset, 3G Connectivity, and iPhone functionality. This version would be sold as an alternative to the iPhone with real computer capabilities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
