<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Survey: Corporations warming to the iPhone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/11/20/survey-corporations-warming-to-the-iphone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/11/20/survey-corporations-warming-to-the-iphone/</link>
	<description>Fortune&#039;s tech team offers analysis and perspective on the world’s most important developments.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 01:57:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan Cornish, Austin, TX</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/11/20/survey-corporations-warming-to-the-iphone/#comment-16666</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Cornish, Austin, TX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortuneapple20.wordpress.com/?p=2756#comment-16666</guid>
		<description>Such silly comments. Sounds like the same arguments that a window OS was a toy and a real business OS was text based(MS-DOS).  Sounds like a plant from the MS FUD department. Today there are over 10,000 app in the App store. We are developing a REAL enterprise app for the iPhone and NOT the Blackberry. Why? Because the things we are doing on the iPhone are impossible on the Treo and Blackberry.



See my post. In my opinion it is game over for RIM, they just do not know it yet.   http://blog.cosential.com/?p=166</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Such silly comments. Sounds like the same arguments that a window OS was a toy and a real business OS was text based(MS-DOS).  Sounds like a plant from the MS FUD department. Today there are over 10,000 app in the App store. We are developing a REAL enterprise app for the iPhone and NOT the Blackberry. Why? Because the things we are doing on the iPhone are impossible on the Treo and Blackberry.</p>
<p>See my post. In my opinion it is game over for RIM, they just do not know it yet.   <a href="http://blog.cosential.com/?p=166" rel="nofollow">http://blog.cosential.com/?p=166</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sloppy, Toronto Ontario</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/11/20/survey-corporations-warming-to-the-iphone/#comment-16665</link>
		<dc:creator>Sloppy, Toronto Ontario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 13:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortuneapple20.wordpress.com/?p=2756#comment-16665</guid>
		<description>The single tasking IPhone is a toy compared to a multi-tasking Curve or Bold.



You play with an IPhone, you get work done with a BlackBerry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The single tasking IPhone is a toy compared to a multi-tasking Curve or Bold.</p>
<p>You play with an IPhone, you get work done with a BlackBerry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cj, baltimore MD</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/11/20/survey-corporations-warming-to-the-iphone/#comment-16664</link>
		<dc:creator>cj, baltimore MD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortuneapple20.wordpress.com/?p=2756#comment-16664</guid>
		<description>where does this crap come from? Only stores 2 days of calls? I have over 4 months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>where does this crap come from? Only stores 2 days of calls? I have over 4 months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris, Charlotte, NC</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/11/20/survey-corporations-warming-to-the-iphone/#comment-16663</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris, Charlotte, NC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 17:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortuneapple20.wordpress.com/?p=2756#comment-16663</guid>
		<description>IBM has developed a mobile version of Lotus Notes for the iPhone. If Big Blue has warmed up to it, it&#039;s definitely worth noticing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IBM has developed a mobile version of Lotus Notes for the iPhone. If Big Blue has warmed up to it, it&#039;s definitely worth noticing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ut, bevelry hills ca</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/11/20/survey-corporations-warming-to-the-iphone/#comment-16662</link>
		<dc:creator>ut, bevelry hills ca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 05:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortuneapple20.wordpress.com/?p=2756#comment-16662</guid>
		<description>guy corp can warm as much as they wanto, iphone is lacking a version with keyboard which most corps dont like. in addition appl does not have  a data center like rim, security is an issue, no push mail. rimm still has a strong foothold in business and with recession i dont see buisnesses running out for iphones. especially if it works dont fix it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>guy corp can warm as much as they wanto, iphone is lacking a version with keyboard which most corps dont like. in addition appl does not have  a data center like rim, security is an issue, no push mail. rimm still has a strong foothold in business and with recession i dont see buisnesses running out for iphones. especially if it works dont fix it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick, Brentwood, ca</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/11/20/survey-corporations-warming-to-the-iphone/#comment-16661</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick, Brentwood, ca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 04:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortuneapple20.wordpress.com/?p=2756#comment-16661</guid>
		<description>I posted here already and someone erased it, I wonder who would do that?



The iPhone is a toy compared to the Treo and Blackberry.  The facts are clear it is simply an iPod with a phone.  The piece is not your businessmans side kick.  Poor speakers, off and on ring switch poorly placed, keypad (forget it) that does not flip so you can use both thumbs, brightness control that is so darn time consuming to adjust, thin and slippery casing, more glamour than useful, only retains 2 days of &quot;recent&quot; calls (the Treo holds like, forever!)  Overall, 6 out of 10, bottomline is it needs a menu key, like the Treo, that brings options up quickly.  Believe me, this iPhone is not a good replacement for any Treo or Blackberry......period!!!



Apple should have looked at real business phones before they make the current toy!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I posted here already and someone erased it, I wonder who would do that?</p>
<p>The iPhone is a toy compared to the Treo and Blackberry.  The facts are clear it is simply an iPod with a phone.  The piece is not your businessmans side kick.  Poor speakers, off and on ring switch poorly placed, keypad (forget it) that does not flip so you can use both thumbs, brightness control that is so darn time consuming to adjust, thin and slippery casing, more glamour than useful, only retains 2 days of &#034;recent&#034; calls (the Treo holds like, forever!)  Overall, 6 out of 10, bottomline is it needs a menu key, like the Treo, that brings options up quickly.  Believe me, this iPhone is not a good replacement for any Treo or Blackberry&#8230;&#8230;period!!!</p>
<p>Apple should have looked at real business phones before they make the current toy!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave, Boston, MA.</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/11/20/survey-corporations-warming-to-the-iphone/#comment-16660</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave, Boston, MA.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 21:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortuneapple20.wordpress.com/?p=2756#comment-16660</guid>
		<description>@ex ped: Ah, but RIM was down 8.41% to Apple’s -6.72%

That is HARDLY a positive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ex ped: Ah, but RIM was down 8.41% to Apple’s -6.72%</p>
<p>That is HARDLY a positive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave, Boston, MA.</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/11/20/survey-corporations-warming-to-the-iphone/#comment-16659</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave, Boston, MA.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 21:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortuneapple20.wordpress.com/?p=2756#comment-16659</guid>
		<description>Usn&#039;t this POSITIVE FOR APPLE and NEGATIVE FOR RIMM??? Yet AAPL is down $5.47 today and RIMM is only down $3.78!!!



ex ped: Ah, but RIM was down 8.41% to Apple&#039;s -6.72%</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Usn&#039;t this POSITIVE FOR APPLE and NEGATIVE FOR RIMM??? Yet AAPL is down $5.47 today and RIMM is only down $3.78!!!</p>
<p>ex ped: Ah, but RIM was down 8.41% to Apple&#039;s -6.72%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don P Los Angeles Ca.</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/11/20/survey-corporations-warming-to-the-iphone/#comment-16658</link>
		<dc:creator>Don P Los Angeles Ca.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortuneapple20.wordpress.com/?p=2756#comment-16658</guid>
		<description>Phil what&#039;s up with the stock though bro?  I mean holy bejesus it&#039;s at pre-iphone levels????  Crazy eh?



ex ped: You should see the other guys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil what&#039;s up with the stock though bro?  I mean holy bejesus it&#039;s at pre-iphone levels????  Crazy eh?</p>
<p>ex ped: You should see the other guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
