<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tech sector snaphot: Apple&#039;s shifting fortunes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/11/19/tech-sector-snaphot-apples-shifting-fortunes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/11/19/tech-sector-snaphot-apples-shifting-fortunes/</link>
	<description>Fortune&#039;s tech team offers analysis and perspective on the world’s most important developments.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 03:43:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: BMWTwisty Johnstown, PA</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/11/19/tech-sector-snaphot-apples-shifting-fortunes/#comment-16525</link>
		<dc:creator>BMWTwisty Johnstown, PA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortuneapple20.wordpress.com/?p=2728#comment-16525</guid>
		<description>So, you&#039;re looking at stock prices which have been hammered down by shorts, &quot;sky-is-falling&quot; bloggers obsessed with negatives (perceived or otherwise) and other hysterics rather than focusing on the fact that the company is kicking butt - still - in a crummy economy. Not impressed.  Oh yeah, it is the Times after all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, you&#039;re looking at stock prices which have been hammered down by shorts, &#034;sky-is-falling&#034; bloggers obsessed with negatives (perceived or otherwise) and other hysterics rather than focusing on the fact that the company is kicking butt &#8211; still &#8211; in a crummy economy. Not impressed.  Oh yeah, it is the Times after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken C, Gardiner, Maine</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/11/19/tech-sector-snaphot-apples-shifting-fortunes/#comment-16523</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken C, Gardiner, Maine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 00:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortuneapple20.wordpress.com/?p=2728#comment-16523</guid>
		<description>Interesting. Reminds me a little of the Hans Rosling charts that he uses when he gives his TED talks, but Hans&#039; are far more fascinating as he talks while they move. Go take a look at one of his many talks. He&#039;s the best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. Reminds me a little of the Hans Rosling charts that he uses when he gives his TED talks, but Hans&#039; are far more fascinating as he talks while they move. Go take a look at one of his many talks. He&#039;s the best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris, San Antonio, TX</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/11/19/tech-sector-snaphot-apples-shifting-fortunes/#comment-16524</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris, San Antonio, TX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 21:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortuneapple20.wordpress.com/?p=2728#comment-16524</guid>
		<description>For PED: Did you look at that chart for the one year timeframe? Would like you to comment on the implications of that. Need some more info on the chart scaling also. Thanks



ex ped: If you slide over to the one-year time frame, the Year and Time Frame [One Year] circles line up, naturally enough, and nobody looks good, from Qualcomm (-24.12%) to Ciena Corp (-85.67%). Apple, at -47.2%, falls somewhere toward the middle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For PED: Did you look at that chart for the one year timeframe? Would like you to comment on the implications of that. Need some more info on the chart scaling also. Thanks</p>
<p>ex ped: If you slide over to the one-year time frame, the Year and Time Frame [One Year] circles line up, naturally enough, and nobody looks good, from Qualcomm (-24.12%) to Ciena Corp (-85.67%). Apple, at -47.2%, falls somewhere toward the middle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
