Big Tech

Covering the digital giants

Sun gambles big as outlook darkens


sun-cantrill-shapiro
Bryan Cantrill and Mike Shapiro, Distinguished Engineers at Sun, dreamed up a new type of storage product and convinced executives to let them build it in relative isolation. Image: Sun

Maybe there's something about unconventional office space that gets Silicon Valley's creative juices flowing.

Bill Hewlett and Dave Packard worked their magic in a garage. Apple's (AAPL) Macintosh development team flew a pirate flag over the Bandley 3 building. Now Sun Microsystems (JAVA) hopes a young team that toiled in an unmarked — and reportedly unkempt –  San Francisco loft can spark a turnaround in a tough economy, and build a new billion-dollar business.

The pizza-fueled group, led by engineering whizzes Mike Shapiro, Bryan Cantrill and Jeff Bonwick, spent about three years developing a new type of data storage box that uses flash technology, off-the-shelf parts and open-source software to help companies store and manage information more effectively. Don't doze off, now – data storage may sound boring, but it's also lucrative. With the explosion in online video, social networking, Web-based software and online commerce, it's about as close to a recession-proof business as you can find.

Just think: Every stock transaction, YouTube video, and Facebook friend request gets stored somewhere. That's why market research firm IDC has network storage pegged as a $4 billion business in the second quarter alone, up 22% over a year before. Tech heavyweights like Hewlett-Packard (HPQ) and Dell (DELL) have recently bought storage outfits to gain a competitive edge.

For Sun, a respected Silicon Valley data center supplier that never completely recovered from the dot-com bust, this growing pot of money is too big an opportunity to pass up. Investment firm Southeastern Asset Management has recently accumulated a fifth of Sun's shares, and has hinted that it might start hunting for suitors whether Sun's board likes it or not. A hit product could buy Sun some time – or even convince investors that it can do just fine on its own.

Shapiro and Cantrill certainly had the brains to come up with something game-changing. The two college buddies, who had risen through Sun's ranks to become Distinguished Engineers, believed that by tapping software they have developed over the years, they could build a new breed of networked storage box that's faster, cheaper, and simpler to operate than the mainstream fare from companies like EMC (EMC) and Network Appliance (NTAP). They decided to bring the idea to top executives. "I honestly though we'd get laughed out of the room and just get told to go back and do our jobs," Shapiro said.

One day in the cafeteria the two cornered Greg Papadopoulos, Sun's chief technology officer, and made an unlikely pitch for resources to pursue their vision. They continued the conversation in his office — and to their surprise, he said yes on the spot. A project code-named Amber Road was born. "Some of our top engineers came and they said this is profoundly important, the time has come, and we want to go do it," Papadopoulos recalled. "I'd better have a good reason to say no."

Actually, he could have come up with several good reasons. Unlike high-fliers like Google (GOOG) and Apple, which have billions in cash and zero debt, Sun doesn't have money to burn on every engineer's pet project: Recently the company reported it had $2.6 billion in cash, $1.2 billion in debt, and enough potholes in its balance sheet that it has announced plans to lay off 350 employees in January. (That alone doesn't sound like much, but Sun has let go of 1,500 employees in recent months.) In the most recent quarter, sales slumped 7% to $3 billion. Sun stock also reflects the harsh reality: it's trading near $4 per share, where it was in early 1995. That's down 80% from a year ago.

If that weren't enough, the Amber Road team asked for its own office space, away from Sun's big-company atmosphere and product development protocols. Shapiro in particular felt that to design an easy-to-use storage system, the team would need to escape Sun's culture. "We build for engineers – lots of knobs and dials and gauges — and that's really anathema for ease of use," Papadopoulos admitted.

So he and systems group chief John Fowler agreed to the group's pleas for independence, under a few conditions. The space couldn't be as nice as Sun's official offices, and there would be no elaborate decorating budget; the team of about a dozen engineers painted it themselves, and found furniture at flea markets. "They love it, it's right across the street from the bus terminal," Papadopoulos said. "You just sort of slide pizzas under the door."

If it sounds like a startup, that's the idea. There's some history of this at Sun; legend has it that James Gosling left the company's offices to work on the Java programming language in rented space on University Avenue in Palo Alto — not far from where Facebook's headquarters is today. But the question is whether this infusion of outside-the-box thinking will be enough to make a difference for Sun's bottom line. "How fast it can grow to be a billion dollars plus, which is what it needs to be, is not clear," admitted Fowler, the systems group chief. But he's optimistic; customers who have seen the new storage product in action can't wait to get their hands on one, he says.

Analysts so far are skeptical. Sun will have to prove that its Sun Storage 7000 appliances are powerful enough to serve the needs of large customers, who tend to be comfortable with companies like EMC whose storage products have longer track records. But the fact that Sun has elegantly built flash-based solid-state storage technology into these boxes should help. IT managers are eyeing solid-state storage as a way to boost performance, and while all of the major storage companies are promising to include it in future systems, Sun is among the first to deliver.

"Can Sun get out there quickly enough and grab market share so they can grow their base before others arrive to the party?" asked Gene Ruth, analyst with Burton Group. "A year from now I suspect we're going to see all the majors out there with significant solid-state products. I always look at Sun as being a technically strong company. Whether they can execute is the question. I hope they do."

This may be one of Sun's last chances to prove it can get something going. For years, rumors have swirled around Silicon Valley that someone will swoop in and buy out the company. Granted, that seems mighty unlikely in this environment –- with scads of plucky startups for sale at bargain-bin prices, why buy a struggling giant? But if the stock stays this cheap, valuing the company at just $3 billion, it's a safe bet that antsy investors will make a move.

a reverse split is a bargain with the devil. Acquire the company for a nickel on the dollar just for the patents and IP. Do a top down mgt cleansing using the same 4-1 reverse split (remove 3, keep 1, use a lottery model since it won't make any difference).

As for flash storage, what for? Itube videos? Give me a break.

Posted By sylvie chen, aukland, new zealand: December 26, 2008 11:41 PM

After its substantial, recent layoffs, SUN hopefully got rid of the bad apples and can at some point hire leaders who can turn the ship around. Otherwise it's bad news.

Posted By Angela, LA, CA: November 16, 2008 7:36 PM

Sun needs to look at its Executives. Notice it is never mgmt that gets caught up in these cuts, since they are the decision makers. Obviously the decisions have not been the right ones. So lets promote them and cut the valuable workers. They are too top heavy, with many of them being empty seats.

Posted By anonymous, santa clara, ca: November 14, 2008 2:01 PM

If Apple encountered some of Sun's patents selling in a Dollar Store then I think they should give them a read and maybe buy a few, but I'd leave all the Sun staff to new Dollar store jobs.

Posted By Kendal, Calgary, AB: November 14, 2008 1:48 PM

Dear drdolittle:

All your patents are belongs to us.

Mr. Billingsly

Posted By Counsel: November 14, 2008 2:10 AM

So what??? Flash based storage has been around since 1992. What's so new about this iteration?

Posted By Jack, Pittsburgh PA: November 13, 2008 8:46 PM

After 20 years at Sun I recently left. The problem at Sun is its executive management team. It lacks any and all courage to make some hard and right decisions. There is a tremendous mutual job protection going on. I have never seen so much incompetence at such high levels – but that's all going to history real soon.

Posted By Frank Lewis, Santa Clara, CA: November 13, 2008 7:26 PM

I believe more on SUN than HP (talking about storage) … I've worked on companies (past and present) and have used their SAN … i got more crashed on storagework than storage tek!!!

Posted By drdolittle, SE of TX: November 13, 2008 5:30 PM

I have worked for both Sun and Apple:

A) Sun can't get a product out the door to save their lives

B) Apple has no use for Sun. What the eff would they do with them? Worthless

Posted By Molly Foggar San Jose CA: November 13, 2008 4:59 PM

>Time to disband SUN, Fire the Engineers and

>sell the pieces to Dell, Compaq/HP etc of

>what’s left of it !!!!

I really wish Apple would buy SUN. They got the cash. They would acquire another but different unix base (AT&T), the storage future and ZFS, which is open, but they would gain the top dog role in its development. Is the real estate and staff and intangibles worth 3bn?? Sigh, probably not.

Posted By Yacko Woonsocket, RI: November 13, 2008 10:45 AM

What happen to the Storage Tek that they bought several years ago?

Posted By Anonymous: November 13, 2008 2:03 AM

Four 4yrs ago I briefly worked on a Sun's project and split FAST !!! The engineers at SUN are very convoluted, frustrated, huge vapor ware EGO. They make a mountain of a mole hill. They are the anti thesis of the KISS principles. Most of the aging engineers are trying to STRETCH their pay checks as much as possible. Job insecurity runs for miles. Soon even SUN won't buy their own products. Time to disband SUN, Fire the Engineers and sell the pieces to Dell, Compaq/HP etc of what's left of it !!!!

Posted By ryan, Fremont, CA: November 13, 2008 1:39 AM

See Joan's post and plz clarify stock price. Post 1-4 reverse stock split last year, this is a sub $1/share company. Drop it, as the execs who decided on this reverse split knew enough to do. Nice run in the heyday, but their inner office politics and beuracracy can't get R&D to produce and deliver.

From Jon Fortt: But they did do the reverse split. So the price is the price.

Posted By Jim, Denver, CO: November 12, 2008 5:16 PM

hooray for fact checking! … oh wait…

Posted By Dave, San Francisco, CA: November 12, 2008 3:49 PM

I'd worked at SUN for over twenty years and they could never overcome all the in-house crap to get a product out the door. Many good ideas have died on the vine. It takes more the inovation these days.

The SUN is setting…

Posted By Chuck Towler Lahaina, hawaii: November 12, 2008 1:28 PM

Sounds very similar to XIV's (now IBM) storage product for the SMB market

Posted By Orr, Tel-Aviv, Israel: November 12, 2008 12:42 PM

Every 10 years or so, Sun creates a storage product that enjoys some market success (SPARCstorage Array, A5000). I hope Amber Road is the next one. Even if it is successful, the company needs to consistently produce winners if it hopes to remain a player. 10 years is a long time to wait for a home run.

Posted By Dave, Louisville, CO: November 12, 2008 12:04 PM

SUN has tried to get it's feet wet with storage for YEARS (and flopped), time to turn out the lights!

Posted By Doug Barnes, ST. Charles IL: November 12, 2008 11:18 AM

Sun is now a penny stock trading at 98 cents. (before 4-1 stock split reversal price)

Posted By joan Morrey, greentree pa: November 12, 2008 11:04 AM
CNNMoney.com Comment Policy: CNNMoney.com encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNNMoney.com may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNNMoney.com the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNNMoney.com Privacy Statement.
Jon fortt

Jon Fortt
A senior writer for Fortune, Jon Fortt focuses on technology and innovation in Silicon Valley – a subject he's been reporting on since his days as a rookie reporter for the Lexington (Ky.) Herald-Leader. Before joining Fortune in 2007, Jon had reporting and editing stints at Business 2.0 magazine, and the San Jose (Calif.) Mercury News, Silicon Valley's hometown newspaper.
Subscribe to Big Tech: RSS feed | email newsletter
* : Time reflects local markets trading time.† - Intraday data delayed 15 minutes for Nasdaq, and 20 minutes for other exchanges.• Disclaimer
Powered by WordPress.com VIP.