Big Tech

Covering the digital giants

Fashion goes 3D


Using OptiTex software, fashion designers can simulate real fabrics on the computer screen – right down to seeing how they'll move when a model twists on the catwalk. Image: OptiTex

You wouldn't know it from browsing the chic fall styles at the mall, but fashion is a messy business. For example, a designer typically makes a shirt three times before perfecting the one you see on the rack, and often the rejects go straight to the trash.

Fashion industry veteran Shenlei Winkler has estimated that in the process of working on one collection that sold at Wal-Mart (WMT) years ago, she generated more than 10 cubic yards of landfill, and spent about $75,000 on materials. "It's a lot of waste," she says, of both time and resources.

Experiences like that inspired Winkler to see if technology can come to the rescue. As founder of the Fashion Research Institute, she's now working with IBM (IBM) Research on a virtual environment where designers up clothes on their PCs, fit them on digital models and revise their patterns. If you've heard of Second Life, you get the gist – except instead of using her virtual space as a digital pickup joint or storefront, Winkler is using it as a workshop.

It's just one example of the fashion world's flirtation with 3D graphics, a trend that could eventually cut the time it takes to bring clothes from concept to the catwalk. It's easy to see why the business could benefit from going digital; unlike many other industries, where robots assemble products, clothes still require lots of costly human handling. Winkler believes that using virtual worlds as a proving ground for ideas, she can cut thousands of dollars – not to mention hours – out of the production process.

But as is often the case with new technology, we have to be careful not to let the hype get ahead of reality. Experts say that while 3D tools might help the designers, they probably won't transform it anytime soon by dramatically lowering costs or upsetting the balance of power in the industry. Instead, says Forrester Research analyst Paul Jackson, designers who digitize more of their work might be able to get new products into stores faster – and that could potentially give them an edge over the competition.

And speed has real value. Just look at the success of Zara, a Spanish retailer that grew into a multibillion-dollar force in global fashion by getting clothes off the drawing board and into stores in weeks rather than months. Winkler is convinced that by using virtual tools, designers will be able to similarly capture some of that speed: "Designers are just going to be able to blow through their work," she says, "and turn in much higher quality."

The tools themselves certainly look promising. One of the standouts is 3D Runway Designer from OptiTex, an Israel-based company. The software is downright uncanny. Plug in information about fabrics, including how they stretch, twist and drape, and you can watch a movie-like sequence as a virtual model tries out the clothes. (Tommy Hilfiger and Target (TGT) are among the customers.) The results are photo realistic, down to the difference in the look of silk versus cotton.

Meanwhile, 3D technology is even appearing closer to retail. In the online stores at H&M, Sears (SHLD) and Land's End, shoppers can try simplified versions of clothes on a digital mannequin that matches their measurements, using technology supplied by Montreal-based My Virtual Model.

The results have been good enough that My Virtual Model says it does about $7 million annually in sales to retailers. But even so, it's not going to replace the dressing room anytime soon, says Trisha Okubo, founder of fashion-advice site Omiru.com.

"Buying a little black dress online isn’t the same as buying a digital camera," Okubo says. "The technology is far from the mainstream – and it very well may stay that way."

Those are probably wise words of warning for fashionistas eager for a 3D revolution.

Posted By Martin van Heusden, Telaviv, Israel: August 22, 2009 10:55 AM

Caveat: I have Optitex but not the module described here. A bit of nuance is missed here. In apparel, designers are closer to stylists. Pattern makers are engineers and the ones who typically use a CAD program like this. In a way, the Optitex modeling process is reclaiming designers as users of this product.

I think this module is useful in two respects. One for designers to visualize piece renderings particularly if they use an off site pattern service. Two, it can be useful for pattern makers as a visual explanation for clients who can't envision how their styles will look. Adept pattern makers can easily do this in their heads but their clients can't. This can be a cost effective design iteration strategy to convey to designers that they might not want what they think they do.

Posted By Kathleen Fasanella, Las Cruces NM: October 9, 2008 11:18 AM

Sylvie,

My Virtual Model does not use any technology to create their image, this is a computer image of the ready made garment as far as I can tell from carefully looking into their solution. OptiTex 3D is an algorithm based real life garment simulator, not a picture and this is a huge difference. the made to measure is a key element and that is correct. as far as I have seen (also on TV) OptiTex currently has the most realistic cloth simulator in the market.

Posted By John Elliott, NY, NY: October 1, 2008 12:49 PM

This is old news. Software to perform fabric draping, stretch, fit and motion have been used since 2000.

My Virtual Model started back then and still very little mainstream use.

3DFit.com pioneered clothing fit to scanned bodies using laser and photo imaging for GAP.

The key problem for designers is how to make mass customization (non-standard sizing) cost effective for garment manufacturing. It's easy to define a perfect fit from a customer's measurements. The challenge is getting the factory in China to make a one-off dress or jacket.

Most of the advances have come from algorithms applied to software tools for graphics in computer games and film. But that's not the real world unfortunately

Posted By sylvie chen, las vegas, nevada: September 30, 2008 2:57 PM

Interesting. Hopefully it will be commonplace in the near future to use an in-store program where you can bring your thumb drive with your measurements and the system recommends clothes that would work best for your body type, etc. from pants and tops to shoes.

Posted By A., Los Angeles, CA: September 28, 2008 12:30 AM
CNNMoney.com Comment Policy: CNNMoney.com encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNNMoney.com may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNNMoney.com the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNNMoney.com Privacy Statement.
Jon fortt

Jon Fortt
A senior writer for Fortune, Jon Fortt focuses on technology and innovation in Silicon Valley – a subject he's been reporting on since his days as a rookie reporter for the Lexington (Ky.) Herald-Leader. Before joining Fortune in 2007, Jon had reporting and editing stints at Business 2.0 magazine, and the San Jose (Calif.) Mercury News, Silicon Valley's hometown newspaper.
Subscribe to Big Tech: RSS feed | email newsletter
* : Time reflects local markets trading time.† - Intraday data delayed 15 minutes for Nasdaq, and 20 minutes for other exchanges.• Disclaimer
Powered by WordPress.com.