Re-engineering AMD
![]() |
| Incoming AMD CEO Dirk Meyer is known as a top-notch chip designer. Image: AMD |
SUNNYVALE, Calif. – Dirk Meyer was six months out of college and working as an engineer for Intel when he ran into Bob Noyce, the company's legendary co-founder and co-inventor of the integrated circuit, at the punch bowl at a shareholders meeting. "He talked to me for 30 minutes – some snot-nosed kid he'd never even heard of," Meyer recalls. "He asked, 'How do you like my company? What do you like? What are you confused about?'"
Noyce's accessibility left a lasting impression – and today Meyer is making himself available for far tougher questions from the investment community in his new role as CEO of Intel arch rival Advanced Micro Devices (AMD). One of the biggest: Can this understated engineer pull this underdog back from the brink of financial disaster?
No mistake, AMD is in a rough spot. After a series of miscues over the past two years, the company faces a depressed stock price, about $5 billion in debt from its purchase of graphics chipmaker ATI, shrinking cash flows and a run of spotty earnings. Last quarter, for instance, the company reported revenues of $1.35 billion, about $100 million short of expectations. Gross margins were five points lower than expected at 37.1%, and market share losses to Intel (INTC) continued.
Meyer, who had been AMD president before rising to CEO last month, knows the company's potential. He has worked there for nearly 13 years, since he was hired to help transform it from a duplicator of Intel's chips into an innovator. In pursuit of that goal, Meyer led engineering for the Athlon processor, a breakthrough that eventually put AMD on the map as a creative force in semiconductors. Determined to fund that seminal effort, then-CEO Jerry Sanders sold off several other businesses. "Jerry had a very clear mission: to create a truly viable alternative to Intel," says Meyer.
For Meyer, AMD's current position bears some similarity to his early days – only the task isn't creating an Intel alternative, it's preserving one. Sure, AMD's reputation is much better established, and its relationships with customers are deeper.
But like Sanders was back then, Meyer is focused on funding AMD's tomorrows by getting rid of expensive assets AMD can do without. That's why the company has announced recently that it would sell its digital TV business to Broadcom (BRCM) for $192.8 million in cash. (The handheld business is also for sale.) These moves, Meyer says, "give us an opportunity to get some cash in the door and improve the balance sheet, lower the debt burden."
This is necessary because chipmaking is an expensive business. Once you've hired hundreds of engineers to design a chip (not cheap) and tested their work (harder than it sounds), you've got to set up massive, state-of-the-art manufacturing facilities, called "fabs," to create them. Doing that by yourself requires an investment of billions of dollars – money Intel has in abundance, and AMD doesn't. Even then, you're not done. For each generation of chips, the fab needs to be upgraded to create more sophisticated chips that pack more power into the same tiny package.
Since it can't afford to do this anymore, AMD plans to spin off its chip manufacturing operations by year's end, probably by hawking them outright or by inking a partnership with a larger chipmaker – a maneuver akin to selling a house and leasing it back. Meyer is vague on the exact timing of a deal, but he knows it's probably the best thing the company can do quickly to improve its financial position, and its reputation with investors. A successful transaction would see AMD pocket a good chunk of cash, while handing manufacturing to a company that can better keep pace with Intel's world-class operations.
"We're going to go away from a captive fab model to more of a fables model for the CPU part of the business," Meyer says. "Longer-term, it relieves us of the burden of having to shell out cash for these gigantic factories. So it will be more of a pay-as-you-go model like a traditional fables semiconductor company."
Until that happens, many on Wall Street will stay tentative about AMD. "We remain on the sidelines with regard to shares of AMD," Patrick Wang at Wedbush Morgan Securities wrote in a recent research note to investors. He has a hold rating on the stock, but said he could get more optimistic when a turnaround seems more imminent. Glen Yeung of Citi Investment Research acknowledges the strategic importance of AMD's efforts to slim down, but says he remains neutral on the company because it's hard to see how it can successfully gain ground on Intel.
When I sat down with Meyer in a wood-paneled conference room at AMD headquarters in Sunnyvale last week, he didn't sugarcoat the company's challenges. Dressed in a collared shirt and no tie, the 46-year-old CEO looks and sounds more like an engineer than the typical chief executive with a ready sales pitch. Other AMD executives I've talked to have hemmed and hawed when I asked them exactly how AMD got into this bind; Meyer puts it plainly. "Unfortunately we bought a company some of whose businesses went downhill at the same time ours did," he says, referring to ATI. "We're in the midst of really lousy financial performance, and it's that piece that we've really got to turn around."
In fact, there remain big moneymaking opportunities for AMD, if the company can get its act together. While dominant PC players like Intel, Hewlett-Packard (HPQ) and Dell (DELL) are looking for growth in mini-laptops and mobile devices, AMD could grow plenty by picking up a few points of market share in the plain-old PC business, where today it has less than a 20 percent share. (Apple (AAPL) has recently shown the power of this concept; as its Mac computers gain share in the PC market, it has scored billions of dollars in sales.)
First, Meyer will have to free AMD from its habit of becoming a victim of its own success. More than once it has launched a popular product then struggled to keep up with demand or deliver timely improvements. The most glaring recent example was AMD's Opteron processor for servers, code-named Barcelona, which last year arrived late and underpowered. AMD also took on new business from Dell and had trouble filling orders for other chips, angering retail partners.
Retailers, Meyer says, perceived the shortages as "AMD screwing our [manufacturing] customers and screwing retail," Meyer says, "so they said let's take a couple of steps back from AMD for a couple of quarters." When that happens, your market share drops and you can forget about profits.
It now falls to Meyer to straighten things out – which prompted me to ask about his leadership approach. Though he played football and baseball growing up and witnessed his share of overbearing coaches, Meyer says he prefers to be the type who pulls someone aside and says, "I'm going to trust you" – and to use his vote of confidence as motivation.
Meyer also recognizes that the personal touch can go too far. At times, he told me, it has led him to give an executive too many chances when that person should have been more quickly replaced with someone better suited to the job.
He'll have very little margin for error in the next few months. Wall Street expects to hear details of the manufacturing spin-off by the end of the year, and to see profits in 2009 after seven straight quarters of losses. If he can engineer that, Wall Street will have plenty to cheer about.
I think AMD going fab-less is the best thing they can do right now. Having their own fabs made them weak points in the battle with Intel, one that Intel exploited. I think one of the main reasons Intel kept shrinking die sizes was because it was a "number" that they could brag about, forcing AMD to spend millions in fab upgrades to follow suit. 90nm and 45nm jumps were totally forced by Intel. A chip manufacturer always wants to go smaller for savings, of course, but they would have spread it out over time if they could have, I'm sure.
So, way to go AMD, I think it's the right move.
Having been in both AMD’s and Intel’s best factories I can say Intel’s factories are much better and Intel has spent the money (that they have and AMD does not) to make it so.
While I believe AMD going fabless is probably the wise thing to do since they do not have an Intel-like war chest full of cash, they will be trading one problem in for a potentially bigger problem with respect to meeting customer demand during the part of the chip business cycle where demand is highest.
Foundries can feel the supply pinch even worse than captive fabs in extreme boom periods. If you consider that foundries have obligations to make many different kinds of chips (for many different customers) and that many of these different chips are also needed to make PCs/laptops, then you can imagine the self-limiting capacity constraint that comes with industry boom times. It doesn’t make sense to make CPUs if there are no chipsets or memory to go with them in the PC for example.
So while AMD will find relief cash-flow-wise, they are giving away some amount of control of their own destiny in managing to the boom in the business cycle. Foundries will not build huge amounts of additional capacity in the hopes that AMD will utilize it unless AMD provides guarantees (a.k.a. "cash"). Going fabless virtually guarantees a limit on AMD’s ability to grow and capture additional market share during the business booms.
AMD doesn't need another nerd leading the company, but a visionair that moves people…
Looks like more and more they lost the game…
@Geek Isles, Florida : No one cares anymore about how fast Intel's lappie CPUs go. The name of the game now in lappies is _platform._ Intel can't do int. graphics to save its butt and Nvidia has massive problems with chip-rot.(check it out in the INQ)
Get with it and check out the @#$%^kickin' GRAPHICS in the new AMD Turion X2 Ultra lappies. Lotsa CPU juice, mooey Grafitas, wot's not to luv?
AMD is back in a big way, and all will be impressed by their latest cpus at 45nm. Intel just finally released some decent power saving Xeons, which still dont have a leg to stand on against the Opterons value. AMD is going to get it right the first time with 45nm, even though they trail in manufacturing technology.
I think Asset Smart or Lite is a good idea. I have worked with foundries and having ASICs manufactured and there is great economies of scale by having another company produce the chips. And they don't need someone to just buy their foundries and upgrade them, they just need to sell them or the equipment in them and move production to a different foundry.
Most likely look for AMD to capitalize on their good relationship with IBM, and their compatable foundries. IBM can keep AMD on the bleeding edge, as it is good business for both companies, since cpus are the highest demand for smaller feature sizes. IBM can see a quicker return on investment.
ATI is also back on top of value and will be payin for itself, as well as make AMD look more attractive, with their excellent chipsets, IGPs, and then the value of the Fusion cpu next year.
Apple (AAPL) has recently shown the power of this concept; as its Mac computers gain share in the PC market, it has scored billions of dollars in sales.
Apples sells computers, AMD sells chips – this comparison is apples to oranges (pun intended). Unless AMD starts making computers, the ASP of the product they sell is FAR different from Apple. I agree AMD could grow in the CPU market, but not by the way or with the leverage as Apple.
To put it in perspective with ~1-1.4Bil in quarterly sales and ~20% market share, AMD would need to DOUBLE market share to add 1Bil/qtr…. please elaborate on how a few % points could equate to BILLIONS in sales? A few points would be ~100-200Mil/qtr and would take YEARS to get billions in additional sales.
Also Meyer is in denial if he thinks the move to Dell and shortage of chips to the channel is the reason for lost market share – it may have contributed to things short term; but that is not the reason AMD is currently suffering losses.
Until that happens, many on Wall Street will stay tentative about the AMD.
Nice article. If you'll excuse me, I've got to go down to the McDonalds, meet my friend the Bob, and then go sightseeing in the Oregon. Wish me the luck!
From Jon Fortt: Thanks for the noticing.
I believe the whole story behind this "Asset Smart" agenda has to do with manufacturing GPUs "in-house" instead of depending on TSMC for it.
"IF" AMD indeed is cosidering the "spin-off" of its fabs, we can all say good bye to them because they won't have a chance against intel. As an example to this, we can all look at Nvidias chip problems sake of not having their own manufacturing assets. If AMD is going to outsource their manufacturing to TSMC, UMC, Chartered (or whoever), let's prepare our selves for delayed, low performing and high power consuming processors. I believe the only one who'll benefit of this whole mess is Intel (and I'll bet anything you want that they are rooting for this to happen).
After Intel, AMD's fabs are the best around the world in manufacturing and process wise.
"while handing manufacturing to a company that can better keep pace with Intel’s world-class operations."
Yeah – that's right !
My boy Dirk gonna find us some dumb sucker of a company that will buy our albatross fabs from us for billions of dollars, spend BILLIONS of DOLLARS MORE on these fabs to upgrade them – out of the kindness of their dumb hearts – just so we at AMD can continue our Jihad against Intel.
Gotta go – I see the suckers are already lining up at Dirk's door.
Suing and Puking-From-My-Gut, Intel Screwed Me Up ! -Bowing Down To Mecca – And Gestapo Raids At Dawn, Hector
Good luck on that AMD. I have been an AMD fan since the K6 series CPU and I am currently using the 6400+, but unfortunately my loyalty has to end and a new laptop I am purchasing is an Intel based machine. Getting Wall Street happy is one challenge, but winning back a loyal fan base will, I believe, be even more challenging. AMD really almost had it and they, almost overnight, screwed it all up.







It's a shame to see AMD struggling worse than ever. Yeah, Intel has the money, the factories, and the contracts. But AMD/ATI tends to get it right a lot more than Intel/Nvidia on the first try. It's just a matter of how AMD plans to survive in harsh times.
AMD/ATI game rigs > Intel/Nvidia rigs any day.