<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AMD leaps back into the game with Puma</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/06/04/amd-leaps-back-into-the-game-with-puma/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/06/04/amd-leaps-back-into-the-game-with-puma/</link>
	<description>Fortune&#039;s tech team offers analysis and perspective on the world’s most important developments.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 03:43:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vlad, Asti, Italy</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/06/04/amd-leaps-back-into-the-game-with-puma/#comment-4932</link>
		<dc:creator>Vlad, Asti, Italy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 15:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigtech.wordpress.com/?p=1137#comment-4932</guid>
		<description>@ maddawg



being a fanboy is always stupid, and I&#039;d like to refresh your memory about what was happening 2 to 4 years ago, when AMD was THE choice to make if you were into performance, and their products would still cost less.

Now that&#039;s history, and even though I like AMD as a Company and the products they make, I&#039;m not so optimistic about them staging a comeback. Not unless Intel really gets hammered BIG TIME by FTC around the world. So I&#039;m still betting on Intel, but that freaking Company has nothing to draw my sympathy.

Still and that&#039;s my point, it&#039;s not about who&#039;s nicer or cuter or whatever you wanna freakin&#039; say. It&#039;s just about who&#039;s got the best products, the best convenience and the best business plan. And Intel has the edge on AMD in each of these aspects at the moment. Let&#039;s stay focused on this and act as the grownups we should be instead of acting as plain idiots, what do we say?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ maddawg</p>
<p>being a fanboy is always stupid, and I&#039;d like to refresh your memory about what was happening 2 to 4 years ago, when AMD was THE choice to make if you were into performance, and their products would still cost less.</p>
<p>Now that&#039;s history, and even though I like AMD as a Company and the products they make, I&#039;m not so optimistic about them staging a comeback. Not unless Intel really gets hammered BIG TIME by FTC around the world. So I&#039;m still betting on Intel, but that freaking Company has nothing to draw my sympathy.</p>
<p>Still and that&#039;s my point, it&#039;s not about who&#039;s nicer or cuter or whatever you wanna freakin&#039; say. It&#039;s just about who&#039;s got the best products, the best convenience and the best business plan. And Intel has the edge on AMD in each of these aspects at the moment. Let&#039;s stay focused on this and act as the grownups we should be instead of acting as plain idiots, what do we say?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maddawg, wash. DC.</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/06/04/amd-leaps-back-into-the-game-with-puma/#comment-4931</link>
		<dc:creator>maddawg, wash. DC.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 17:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigtech.wordpress.com/?p=1137#comment-4931</guid>
		<description>LMAO @ STEVE,



an AMD fanboy? i&#039;ve never heard of somebody so stupid....you are too pathetic!!



but then again, losers have to have fanboys too....!!!



lol...only the technically challenged sport AMDs with such blind enthusiasm.



get ready for another losing season amd...you&#039;ve got plenty of practice so you&#039;ll be best suited to just go with it!



p.s...just because you&#039;re cheap enough to NEED to buy an amd, does not mean you&#039;re smart enough to know the difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LMAO @ STEVE,</p>
<p>an AMD fanboy? i&#039;ve never heard of somebody so stupid&#8230;.you are too pathetic!!</p>
<p>but then again, losers have to have fanboys too&#8230;.!!!</p>
<p>lol&#8230;only the technically challenged sport AMDs with such blind enthusiasm.</p>
<p>get ready for another losing season amd&#8230;you&#039;ve got plenty of practice so you&#039;ll be best suited to just go with it!</p>
<p>p.s&#8230;just because you&#039;re cheap enough to NEED to buy an amd, does not mean you&#039;re smart enough to know the difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danovan Thorpe, New Haven, CT</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/06/04/amd-leaps-back-into-the-game-with-puma/#comment-4930</link>
		<dc:creator>Danovan Thorpe, New Haven, CT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 18:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigtech.wordpress.com/?p=1137#comment-4930</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see why they would sue, I mean how can you confuse the two. Amd will not advertise its product as Puma, its call the Turion X2 Ultra.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t see why they would sue, I mean how can you confuse the two. Amd will not advertise its product as Puma, its call the Turion X2 Ultra.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: usuxamd, austin, tx</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/06/04/amd-leaps-back-into-the-game-with-puma/#comment-4929</link>
		<dc:creator>usuxamd, austin, tx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 14:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigtech.wordpress.com/?p=1137#comment-4929</guid>
		<description>the only dumb comment is made by peopel who say &quot; AMD is beating INTEL hard&quot;! this is another paper launch by AMD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the only dumb comment is made by peopel who say &#034; AMD is beating INTEL hard&#034;! this is another paper launch by AMD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mahi,woodside,ny</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/06/04/amd-leaps-back-into-the-game-with-puma/#comment-4928</link>
		<dc:creator>Mahi,woodside,ny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 14:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigtech.wordpress.com/?p=1137#comment-4928</guid>
		<description>amd is best chip maker</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>amd is best chip maker</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve, NYC, NY</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/06/04/amd-leaps-back-into-the-game-with-puma/#comment-4927</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve, NYC, NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 13:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigtech.wordpress.com/?p=1137#comment-4927</guid>
		<description>John Capehart = Intel Fanboy

Paul from Boulder = dumb comment, they are laptops not shoes



All Intel fanboys just make dumb comments because they are getting beat hard.  I love AMD, and hope to see their success</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Capehart = Intel Fanboy</p>
<p>Paul from Boulder = dumb comment, they are laptops not shoes</p>
<p>All Intel fanboys just make dumb comments because they are getting beat hard.  I love AMD, and hope to see their success</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Raymond</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/06/04/amd-leaps-back-into-the-game-with-puma/#comment-4925</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Raymond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 13:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigtech.wordpress.com/?p=1137#comment-4925</guid>
		<description>Actually, Puma (the shoe company) would only have a trademark on shoes and perhaps clothing. Trademarks are generally limited to specific markets. Thus, I could sell &quot;Excel Ice Cream&quot; without being sued by Microsoft.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Puma (the shoe company) would only have a trademark on shoes and perhaps clothing. Trademarks are generally limited to specific markets. Thus, I could sell &#034;Excel Ice Cream&#034; without being sued by Microsoft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Capehart</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/06/04/amd-leaps-back-into-the-game-with-puma/#comment-4924</link>
		<dc:creator>John Capehart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 05:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigtech.wordpress.com/?p=1137#comment-4924</guid>
		<description>key word: could</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>key word: could</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul, Boulder, CO</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/06/04/amd-leaps-back-into-the-game-with-puma/#comment-4926</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul, Boulder, CO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 05:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigtech.wordpress.com/?p=1137#comment-4926</guid>
		<description>Just hope they don&#039;t get sued by a certain shoe maker...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just hope they don&#039;t get sued by a certain shoe maker&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
