<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 3G iPhone: Spy shots from around the world</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/05/31/3g-iphone-spy-shots-from-around-the-world/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/05/31/3g-iphone-spy-shots-from-around-the-world/</link>
	<description>Fortune&#039;s tech team offers analysis and perspective on the world’s most important developments.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 03:43:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Horwitz, East Amherst, New York</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/05/31/3g-iphone-spy-shots-from-around-the-world/#comment-11531</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Horwitz, East Amherst, New York</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 20:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortuneapple20.wordpress.com/?p=605#comment-11531</guid>
		<description>To be clear, iLounge didn&#039;t claim that specs were sent &lt;i&gt;by Apple&lt;/i&gt; to third-party manufacturers; rather, this was the unfounded, incorrect interpretation of our report that &quot;companies overseas have already started working on products&quot; based on details noted in our image: different tapering, a different sensor array, the same screen size, different bottom holes and bezel proportions, and certain colors. Photographs matching these details are apparently authentic; ones that do not, are not.



Another note is that the &quot;EXO Mask&quot; image was later confirmed by the designer, from a company of ill-repute, to be based on guesses rather than actual knowledge. That image and others were floated merely to draw attention to the company&#039;s obscure Chinese exports business, and unfortunately were taken seriously by people who don&#039;t know the history.



ex ped: Thanks for clarifying. I&#039;ll fix the wording of the piece.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be clear, iLounge didn&#039;t claim that specs were sent <i>by Apple</i> to third-party manufacturers; rather, this was the unfounded, incorrect interpretation of our report that &#034;companies overseas have already started working on products&#034; based on details noted in our image: different tapering, a different sensor array, the same screen size, different bottom holes and bezel proportions, and certain colors. Photographs matching these details are apparently authentic; ones that do not, are not.</p>
<p>Another note is that the &#034;EXO Mask&#034; image was later confirmed by the designer, from a company of ill-repute, to be based on guesses rather than actual knowledge. That image and others were floated merely to draw attention to the company&#039;s obscure Chinese exports business, and unfortunately were taken seriously by people who don&#039;t know the history.</p>
<p>ex ped: Thanks for clarifying. I&#039;ll fix the wording of the piece.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
