<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top-paid CEOs: Steve Jobs drops from No. 1 to No. 120</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/05/02/top-paid-ceos-steve-jobs-drops-from-no-1-to-no-120/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/05/02/top-paid-ceos-steve-jobs-drops-from-no-1-to-no-120/</link>
	<description>Fortune&#039;s tech team offers analysis and perspective on the world’s most important developments.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 01:57:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JD, Las Vegas NV</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/05/02/top-paid-ceos-steve-jobs-drops-from-no-1-to-no-120/#comment-10803</link>
		<dc:creator>JD, Las Vegas NV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 02:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortuneapple20.wordpress.com/?p=507#comment-10803</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s from a list of top CEO compensation 2007:



2. John Thain, Merrill Lynch &amp; Co., $83.1 million

6. Lloyd Blankfein, Goldman Sachs Group Inc., $53.9 million

9. John Mack, Morgan Stanley, $41.7 million



Merrill Lynch was a bailout disguised as a buyout, the other two were bailout companies.  Money well spent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#039;s from a list of top CEO compensation 2007:</p>
<p>2. John Thain, Merrill Lynch &amp; Co., $83.1 million</p>
<p>6. Lloyd Blankfein, Goldman Sachs Group Inc., $53.9 million</p>
<p>9. John Mack, Morgan Stanley, $41.7 million</p>
<p>Merrill Lynch was a bailout disguised as a buyout, the other two were bailout companies.  Money well spent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Borean, Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/05/02/top-paid-ceos-steve-jobs-drops-from-no-1-to-no-120/#comment-10802</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Borean, Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 14:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortuneapple20.wordpress.com/?p=507#comment-10802</guid>
		<description>I think that if you hold stock in a company who&#039;s CEO is on this list you may have made a bad investment. I haven&#039;t the time on a Sunday morning to crunch the numbers, but how much value did each of these CEOs bring to the shareholder, and does their pay match this?



A quick look at the numbers in the column makes me think that Steve Jobs was a bargain this year, and a disaster last year. Larry Ellison looks like a disaster, heck anyone in the top 12 looks like a probable disaster, and I would hesitate to buy stock in their companies.



Executive compensation appears to (in some companies) be out of control. It needs to be based on the value that the executive brings to his bosses, the stock holders, in a market based approach.



At least that&#039;s how I see it. Mind you, I&#039;d love to have Larry Ellison&#039;s salary .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that if you hold stock in a company who&#039;s CEO is on this list you may have made a bad investment. I haven&#039;t the time on a Sunday morning to crunch the numbers, but how much value did each of these CEOs bring to the shareholder, and does their pay match this?</p>
<p>A quick look at the numbers in the column makes me think that Steve Jobs was a bargain this year, and a disaster last year. Larry Ellison looks like a disaster, heck anyone in the top 12 looks like a probable disaster, and I would hesitate to buy stock in their companies.</p>
<p>Executive compensation appears to (in some companies) be out of control. It needs to be based on the value that the executive brings to his bosses, the stock holders, in a market based approach.</p>
<p>At least that&#039;s how I see it. Mind you, I&#039;d love to have Larry Ellison&#039;s salary .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carrie, calgary canada</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/05/02/top-paid-ceos-steve-jobs-drops-from-no-1-to-no-120/#comment-10801</link>
		<dc:creator>carrie, calgary canada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 23:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortuneapple20.wordpress.com/?p=507#comment-10801</guid>
		<description>So that&#039;s a bad thing that he gets paid so little??? I don&#039;t think so.  I don&#039;t like the idea of owning stock where the CEO gets paid 192 million a year (ORACLE) - it makes me wonder why they can&#039;t find anything better to do with that money. Well done APPLE!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So that&#039;s a bad thing that he gets paid so little??? I don&#039;t think so.  I don&#039;t like the idea of owning stock where the CEO gets paid 192 million a year (ORACLE) &#8211; it makes me wonder why they can&#039;t find anything better to do with that money. Well done APPLE!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott, sydney, NSW</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/05/02/top-paid-ceos-steve-jobs-drops-from-no-1-to-no-120/#comment-10800</link>
		<dc:creator>scott, sydney, NSW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 21:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortuneapple20.wordpress.com/?p=507#comment-10800</guid>
		<description>Please read correctly before you comment, the list shows

&quot;top 12 technology CEOs&quot; not over the whole range, where is was No 120.



Keep up the good work Steve, its the coming years where you will really shine, ie after apple hits $1000</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please read correctly before you comment, the list shows</p>
<p>&#034;top 12 technology CEOs&#034; not over the whole range, where is was No 120.</p>
<p>Keep up the good work Steve, its the coming years where you will really shine, ie after apple hits $1000</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter, Cupertino, CA</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/05/02/top-paid-ceos-steve-jobs-drops-from-no-1-to-no-120/#comment-10799</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter, Cupertino, CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 21:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortuneapple20.wordpress.com/?p=507#comment-10799</guid>
		<description>Hey Fortune, how about doing a list of CEO pay over 5 years instead of just one? That along with shareholder returns over that span might actually show which CEO&#039;s are earning their pay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Fortune, how about doing a list of CEO pay over 5 years instead of just one? That along with shareholder returns over that span might actually show which CEO&#039;s are earning their pay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fabio, Italy</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/05/02/top-paid-ceos-steve-jobs-drops-from-no-1-to-no-120/#comment-10798</link>
		<dc:creator>Fabio, Italy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 20:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortuneapple20.wordpress.com/?p=507#comment-10798</guid>
		<description>120?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>120?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey Melton, Fort Wayne, IN</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/05/02/top-paid-ceos-steve-jobs-drops-from-no-1-to-no-120/#comment-10797</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Melton, Fort Wayne, IN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 20:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortuneapple20.wordpress.com/?p=507#comment-10797</guid>
		<description>Your headline says &#039;120&#039; instead of &#039;12&#039;



ex ped: Jobs is No. 120 in the list that includes all U.S. CEOs and No. 11 in the list of tech CEOs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your headline says &#039;120&#039; instead of &#039;12&#039;</p>
<p>ex ped: Jobs is No. 120 in the list that includes all U.S. CEOs and No. 11 in the list of tech CEOs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
