Big Tech

Covering the digital giants

'Cloud' computing's reliability gap


Online software may be the future of computing – but the truth is, it's far from perfect.

  • February 12: Research in Motion’s BlackBerry e-mail service goes on the blink for three hours, and slows again a week later.
  • February 15: Problems with Amazon Web Services' S3 online storage service takes several sites down for two hours.
  • February 24: Google’s YouTube video service is knocked offline.
  • February 26: Some customers of Microsoft’s Hotmail e-mail have their service unavailable for several hours.

In January 2006, Salesforce.com (CRM) faced a crisis. Service outages at the online software company had rankled customers, and threatened to spook investors and send the stock skidding.

For a business whose model relies on companies that ditch desktop software for Internet-based services, this was a serious problem. Unless Salesforce could assure the public that its online business management tools were reliable, it risked losing its momentum and giving the entire online software revolution a bum rap.

Fast forward two years, and recent headlines suggests the reliability issue hasn't gone away. Several high-profile blackouts hit the Internet’s most popular services in February, including YouTube (GOOG), Hotmail (MSFT), Amazon (AMZN) and BlackBerry (RIMM) e-mail. But while popular services are struggling to keep the lights on 100 percent of the time, companies are also discovering that honesty matters more than perfection.

Salesforce, for example, learned that lesson after its January 2006 system failures. Executives realized that a lack of information during the outage had frustrated customers as much as the outage itself, and decided to take a bold step: The company would let the public see exactly how its system is functioning every day, sharing embarrassing details every time the system slowed or stopped working.

"This was opening up the kimono to our customers in a way that really hadn't been done before," said Bruce Francis, vice president of corporate strategy at Salesforce.com. "But what's more frustrating: the fact that there's a problem, or that you're not getting the right information? Usually it's that you're not getting the information. When we realized that customers just wanted that transparency, we gave it to them, and that really helped build trust.”

There was more at stake than just goodwill. In recent years, online services have emerged as an important profit engine for the technology industry, as tasks from payroll to video editing move online. Large players such as Google and Microsoft are placing billion-dollar bets that in the future, many more people will store their data and run their programs through "in the cloud" through the Internet, rather than solely through desktop software. But for that vision to become reality, customers will have to remain confident that Internet-based systems will work when needed.

"Culturally we’ve gone through a rite of passage where we now trust that in-the-cloud services are going to be there at all times," said Bill McNee, CEO of Saugatuck Technology, an analyst firm. And despite the glitches, McNee said, that faith is well founded: "The level of reliability and availability is substantially better with these online services than it is within most companies that try to run their own systems."

And it's getting better all the time. Zach Nelson, CEO of online business software provider Netsuite (N), said that while the best service providers are always striving for perfect performance, they also learn a lot when things go wrong.

"These failures in services like Hotmail and YouTube and others? Guess what, it helps you learn about the process of delivering it more efficiently next time," Nelson said. "We've come a long way in a very short time."

Still, customers have their limits. Before Amazon's online services faced problems earlier this month, the company had already realized it needed to create a site, similar to Salesforce.com's, that displays the health of its system. While the interruption was short, and the company said customers mostly took it in stride, customers also made their displeasure clear on message boards. "My business is effectively closed right now because Amazon did something wrong," one person wrote during the outage. "I'll have to reconsider using the service now." Companies may learn from failure – but so do consumers, and not always the same lessons.

Despite what many pundits have to say, reliability issues will not be the downfall of cloud computing. Using cloud computing does not mean neglecting to architect solutions that meet their business requirements, including reliability requirements.

I wrote more about this idea here:

Cloud Computing and Reliability

http://faseidl.com/public/item/212584

Posted By F. Andy Seidl, Ann Arbor, MI: September 10, 2008 11:38 AM

We resell a private branded Exchange Online and SharePoint Online through groupSPARK ((http://www.groupspark.com/)) and get great 24/7 service for our client’s mission critical data.

If you want to be in the clouds you had better have a pilot or at least be

Posted By howardtoronto: March 12, 2008 8:07 PM

Just be a little patient. I am sure that electric power service outage notifications from early 1896 were comparable to what you state. Do we doubt central electricity supply today?

http://www.felgner.ch/2007/12/time_to_switch_to_the_cloud.html

Posted By Harald Felgner, Zurich, Switzerland: March 3, 2008 11:15 AM

We're all supposed to know what 'Cloud' is? You use it as the tile

and then is no longer mentioned.

From Jon Fortt: It's mentioned again in the sixth graf. But I can see how it would be confusing.

Posted By Jack Singleton, Malibu, CA: February 29, 2008 5:48 PM

I am not sure what point author is trying to make here. These services are far more reliable and effective than what i get from internally managed and designed systems.

As a consumer, it is a small inconvenience to pay if i can't access the service for few hours vs the quality, ease of use, effectiveness as well as faster improvement.

Posted By Sri, Fremont, CA: February 29, 2008 12:33 PM

As a long-time salesforce user, I lived through that outage described in the article. Yes, it was frustrating, but to this day I have not had a single problem related to the application. I can't say the same for other applications I use to run by business.

Apps will crash, data will be lost, and people will nash their teeth. To me, it's about usability, accessability, and a reasonable level of dependability mixed with some integrity and honesty.

Posted By Jeff, Boston MA: February 29, 2008 12:15 PM

Years ago it was, "the mainframe is down" and no one could work. Then the PC came along and we all had our own version of the software. That didn't last long before they moved the software to a server and then it was "the server is down" or "the network is down". Now we've moved the software to another site altogether and it's "the Internet connection is down". No wonder economists claim they can't measure how computers have increased productivity.

Posted By Mike S., St. Louis, MO: February 29, 2008 11:15 AM
CNNMoney.com Comment Policy: CNNMoney.com encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNNMoney.com may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNNMoney.com the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNNMoney.com Privacy Statement.
Jon fortt

Jon Fortt
A senior writer for Fortune, Jon Fortt focuses on technology and innovation in Silicon Valley – a subject he's been reporting on since his days as a rookie reporter for the Lexington (Ky.) Herald-Leader. Before joining Fortune in 2007, Jon had reporting and editing stints at Business 2.0 magazine, and the San Jose (Calif.) Mercury News, Silicon Valley's hometown newspaper.
Subscribe to Big Tech: RSS feed | email newsletter
* : Time reflects local markets trading time.† - Intraday data delayed 15 minutes for Nasdaq, and 20 minutes for other exchanges.• Disclaimer
Powered by WordPress.com VIP.