Apple 2.0

Mac news from outside the reality distortion field

Research report: Nanopants that might power an iPod


nanopants.jpgAh, the promise of piezoelectric fiber pairs.

"Remarkable New Clothing May Someday Power Your iPod®," reads the headline of today's National Science Foundation press release, complete with the dutiful ® symbol that nobody outside Apple (AAPL) ever bothers to use.

The release describes nanotech clothing being designed at the Georgia Institute of Technology that converts the wearer's motion into electricity that can be used to power small electrical devices.

A report in the Feb. 14 issue of Nature explains how pairs of textile fibers covered with zinc oxide nanowires generate electricity in response to applied mechanical stress.

"The two fibers scrub together just like two bottle brushes with their bristles touching, and the piezoelectric-semiconductor process converts the mechanical motion into electrical energy," says Georgia Tech professor Zhong Lin Wang.

Wang and his collaborators have made more than 200 fiber nanogenerators so far and have measured as much as 4 nanoamperes and output voltage of about 4 millivolts from two 1-cm fibers. Wang estimates that a square meter of this fabric could generate as much as 80 milliwatts.

The one wrinkle in the technology (NSF's pun, not mine) is that zinc oxide is sensitive to moisture. You wouldn't throw your iPod in the washing machine, and your nanopants shouldn't go in there either.

The research was funded by NSF's Division of Materials Research and sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy and the Emory-Georgia Tech Nanotechnology Center for Personalized and Predictive Oncology, of all people.

For more information, see the NSF release here.

The scanning electron microscope image is reposted courtesy of Z.L. Wang and X.D. Wang, Georgia Institute of Technology.

My daughter managed to put her iPod Shuffle in the washing machine – and after drying it up it worked perfectly again. Maybe the nano trousers will to…

Posted By Jorgen Olsson, Taby, Sweden: February 14, 2008 11:47 AM

How is this news particular to "Apple" more so than any other personal device? It's not.

Although interesting this is simply fodder, I mean let's face it, you can't slam Apple every day without making it most obvious you're a hired institutional manipulator. This kind of meaningless fodder helps to legitimize your agnostic argument.

Do you realize that Mac sales being "flat sequentially" actually translates into huge upside for Apple? Their fiscal second quarter is usually down across the board which is why earnings are forecast down at the beginning of each year. Looks like that trend may be mitigated this year.

Posted By TX: February 14, 2008 9:03 AM
CNNMoney.com Comment Policy: CNNMoney.com encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNNMoney.com may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNNMoney.com the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNNMoney.com Privacy Statement.
Philip Elmer-DeWitt

Philip Elmer-DeWitt
Steve Jobs, goes the old joke at Apple, is surrounded by a reality distortion field; get too close and you believe what he's saying. Apple has made believers out of millions of customers — and made a lot of investors rich — but Philip Elmer-DeWitt believes that an ounce of skepticism never hurts when writing about the company. He should know. He's been covering Apple – and watching Steve Jobs operate — since 1982.
Subscribe to Apple 2.0: RSS feed | email newsletter
* : Time reflects local markets trading time.† - Intraday data delayed 15 minutes for Nasdaq, and 20 minutes for other exchanges.• Disclaimer
Powered by WordPress.com.