<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Time Magazine picks gadget of the year</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/12/12/time-magazine-picks-apples-iphone-for-gadget-of-the-year/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/12/12/time-magazine-picks-apples-iphone-for-gadget-of-the-year/</link>
	<description>Fortune&#039;s tech team offers analysis and perspective on the world’s most important developments.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 01:57:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DeeinAustin, Austin, TX</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/12/12/time-magazine-picks-apples-iphone-for-gadget-of-the-year/#comment-7713</link>
		<dc:creator>DeeinAustin, Austin, TX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 15:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/12/12/time-magazine-picks-apples-iphone-for-gadget-of-the-year/#comment-7713</guid>
		<description>Even though Apple won the Invention of the Year, I find it astonishing that the Austin Board of REALTORS implemented a new MLS that doesn&#039;t allow Mac users access to homes. http://texasrealestate.blogs.com/weblog/2007/12/austin-board-of.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though Apple won the Invention of the Year, I find it astonishing that the Austin Board of REALTORS implemented a new MLS that doesn&#039;t allow Mac users access to homes. <a href="http://texasrealestate.blogs.com/weblog/2007/12/austin-board-of.html" rel="nofollow">http://texasrealestate.blogs.com/weblog/2007/12/austin-board-of.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MadDawg, DC.</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/12/12/time-magazine-picks-apples-iphone-for-gadget-of-the-year/#comment-7712</link>
		<dc:creator>MadDawg, DC.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 15:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/12/12/time-magazine-picks-apples-iphone-for-gadget-of-the-year/#comment-7712</guid>
		<description>oh no....



not another, &quot;this is the best thing since sliced bread....although the technologies already existed and for 1/4th the cost.&quot; article....





lol...the iPhone gets gadget of the year? only in america can a rip off of existing technologies be wrapped in a shiny bundle and get &#039;gadget of the year&#039;.



am i the only person with vision that can see A CELL PHONE THAT DOES THE SAME AS A DOZEN OTHERS IS NOT A &#039;GADGET OF THE YEAR&#039;.



as a matter of fact, the only thing the iPhone has that is different from other devices is the OS. now it is a nice OS and that makes sense seeing as apple has been writing OSs for over 20 years (they have to get it right at some point don&#039;t they??)....but gadget of the year; lmao...IT&#039;S CLOSER TO PAPER-WEIGHT OF THE YEAR.



anyone can wrap a &#039;Piece of Chit&#039; in a shiny wrapper and trumpet it as the newest technology since the space program......



again, i&#039;m glad i&#039;m not the typical lemming of society.....you R-Tards keep buying the re-wrapped technology of yesterday and call it the gadget of the year....



i mean lets think of it...what makes the apple products useful to so few?? it&#039;s because they are built for retards that in most cases lack even the most basic of common sense.



don&#039;t get me wrong...i&#039;ve used apple products over the last 25 years (never bought any apple products though...i could never convince myself i was that retarded) and with so much experience using their products i can still conclude, apple brings up the rear with simple minded products for those very few that need a challenge for their simple minds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh no&#8230;.</p>
<p>not another, &#034;this is the best thing since sliced bread&#8230;.although the technologies already existed and for 1/4th the cost.&#034; article&#8230;.</p>
<p>lol&#8230;the iPhone gets gadget of the year? only in america can a rip off of existing technologies be wrapped in a shiny bundle and get &#039;gadget of the year&#039;.</p>
<p>am i the only person with vision that can see A CELL PHONE THAT DOES THE SAME AS A DOZEN OTHERS IS NOT A &#039;GADGET OF THE YEAR&#039;.</p>
<p>as a matter of fact, the only thing the iPhone has that is different from other devices is the OS. now it is a nice OS and that makes sense seeing as apple has been writing OSs for over 20 years (they have to get it right at some point don&#039;t they??)&#8230;.but gadget of the year; lmao&#8230;IT&#039;S CLOSER TO PAPER-WEIGHT OF THE YEAR.</p>
<p>anyone can wrap a &#039;Piece of Chit&#039; in a shiny wrapper and trumpet it as the newest technology since the space program&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>again, i&#039;m glad i&#039;m not the typical lemming of society&#8230;..you R-Tards keep buying the re-wrapped technology of yesterday and call it the gadget of the year&#8230;.</p>
<p>i mean lets think of it&#8230;what makes the apple products useful to so few?? it&#039;s because they are built for retards that in most cases lack even the most basic of common sense.</p>
<p>don&#039;t get me wrong&#8230;i&#039;ve used apple products over the last 25 years (never bought any apple products though&#8230;i could never convince myself i was that retarded) and with so much experience using their products i can still conclude, apple brings up the rear with simple minded products for those very few that need a challenge for their simple minds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ballmer, Redmond WA.</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/12/12/time-magazine-picks-apples-iphone-for-gadget-of-the-year/#comment-7711</link>
		<dc:creator>ballmer, Redmond WA.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 11:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/12/12/time-magazine-picks-apples-iphone-for-gadget-of-the-year/#comment-7711</guid>
		<description>MY GUESS WAS ZUNE!

The new Zunes are a cut above everything else in the space! Rent your music, life is tempoary!

http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MY GUESS WAS ZUNE!</p>
<p>The new Zunes are a cut above everything else in the space! Rent your music, life is tempoary!</p>
<p><a href="http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mfearing</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/12/12/time-magazine-picks-apples-iphone-for-gadget-of-the-year/#comment-7709</link>
		<dc:creator>mfearing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 05:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/12/12/time-magazine-picks-apples-iphone-for-gadget-of-the-year/#comment-7709</guid>
		<description>Great blog. And great point about naming. Tech companies either go too light, and non-descriptive, or too tech heavy - roman numerals ETC. Apple has a great ability to market themselves. Disney also has this ability to get their brand out and about, resonating and looking good. I think it is fair to say Microsoft doesn&#039;t actually know how to compete. They win by being bigger and &#039;badder&#039; and meaner at this point. They will face blow-back and many other companies will prosper because of that.



Mark

http://mfearing.wordpress.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great blog. And great point about naming. Tech companies either go too light, and non-descriptive, or too tech heavy &#8211; roman numerals ETC. Apple has a great ability to market themselves. Disney also has this ability to get their brand out and about, resonating and looking good. I think it is fair to say Microsoft doesn&#039;t actually know how to compete. They win by being bigger and &#039;badder&#039; and meaner at this point. They will face blow-back and many other companies will prosper because of that.</p>
<p>Mark</p>
<p><a href="http://mfearing.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">http://mfearing.wordpress.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan, Boston, MA</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/12/12/time-magazine-picks-apples-iphone-for-gadget-of-the-year/#comment-7710</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan, Boston, MA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 17:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/12/12/time-magazine-picks-apples-iphone-for-gadget-of-the-year/#comment-7710</guid>
		<description>Keep dreaming Murph.  90+% of all PC&#039;s are shipped with MSFT operating systems.  That won&#039;t change anytime soon.  Keep fighting that battle though.  Apple may crack 10% in market share one of these decades.  And good luck selling iPods when there is no content left on iTunes.  Outside of delusional fanboys who are &quot;loyal&quot; to a web store, rational consumers will gravitate to where the content is.  AAPL is priced for perfection.  $650?  You realize it&#039;s at $192 right now, right?  Where is all this growth going to come from?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep dreaming Murph.  90+% of all PC&#039;s are shipped with MSFT operating systems.  That won&#039;t change anytime soon.  Keep fighting that battle though.  Apple may crack 10% in market share one of these decades.  And good luck selling iPods when there is no content left on iTunes.  Outside of delusional fanboys who are &#034;loyal&#034; to a web store, rational consumers will gravitate to where the content is.  AAPL is priced for perfection.  $650?  You realize it&#039;s at $192 right now, right?  Where is all this growth going to come from?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lav  Capitola, CA</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/12/12/time-magazine-picks-apples-iphone-for-gadget-of-the-year/#comment-7708</link>
		<dc:creator>Lav  Capitola, CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 16:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/12/12/time-magazine-picks-apples-iphone-for-gadget-of-the-year/#comment-7708</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Apple stock is heading to $650.00 by 2009!



Bookmark that!&lt;/i&gt;



No; AAPL won&#039;t even hit $500 until sometime in 2010.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Apple stock is heading to $650.00 by 2009!</p>
<p>Bookmark that!</i></p>
<p>No; AAPL won&#039;t even hit $500 until sometime in 2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim, Rotterdam, Netherlands</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/12/12/time-magazine-picks-apples-iphone-for-gadget-of-the-year/#comment-7707</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim, Rotterdam, Netherlands</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 16:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/12/12/time-magazine-picks-apples-iphone-for-gadget-of-the-year/#comment-7707</guid>
		<description>Hey PED,



Your initials are on the new iPhone rumor page.



http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/07/12/12/second_gen_iphone_in_final_phase_apple_tv_update_planned_report.html





ex ped: Huh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey PED,</p>
<p>Your initials are on the new iPhone rumor page.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/07/12/12/second_gen_iphone_in_final_phase_apple_tv_update_planned_report.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/07/12/12/second_gen_iphone_in_final_phase_apple_tv_update_planned_report.html</a></p>
<p>ex ped: Huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim, Rotterdam, Holland</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/12/12/time-magazine-picks-apples-iphone-for-gadget-of-the-year/#comment-7706</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim, Rotterdam, Holland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 15:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/12/12/time-magazine-picks-apples-iphone-for-gadget-of-the-year/#comment-7706</guid>
		<description>&quot;Do you think the iPhone would have made the cut if Steve Jobs had called it the Apple SPH200W Wi-Fi Skype-free Phone?&quot;



UHHHH??????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#034;Do you think the iPhone would have made the cut if Steve Jobs had called it the Apple SPH200W Wi-Fi Skype-free Phone?&#034;</p>
<p>UHHHH??????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: imurph, Waltham, MA</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/12/12/time-magazine-picks-apples-iphone-for-gadget-of-the-year/#comment-7705</link>
		<dc:creator>imurph, Waltham, MA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/12/12/time-magazine-picks-apples-iphone-for-gadget-of-the-year/#comment-7705</guid>
		<description>Apple is winning the Apple vs Microsoft battle.  I can say Microsoft Won the first round, but is losing BIG TIME to Apple front in iPods, Mac OS X and the best of breed iTunes.



Apple stock is heading to $650.00 by 2009!



Bookmark that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple is winning the Apple vs Microsoft battle.  I can say Microsoft Won the first round, but is losing BIG TIME to Apple front in iPods, Mac OS X and the best of breed iTunes.</p>
<p>Apple stock is heading to $650.00 by 2009!</p>
<p>Bookmark that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
