<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple Set to Disable iPhone Apps &#8212; Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/11/04/apple-set-to-disable-iphone-apps-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/11/04/apple-set-to-disable-iphone-apps-again/</link>
	<description>Fortune&#039;s tech team offers analysis and perspective on the world’s most important developments.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 01:57:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vicki Marietta Georgia</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/11/04/apple-set-to-disable-iphone-apps-again/#comment-7230</link>
		<dc:creator>Vicki Marietta Georgia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 14:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/11/04/apple-set-to-disable-iphone-apps-again/#comment-7230</guid>
		<description>Who said buying anything by Apple is the cheapest - Apple is a premium product. Like a Mercedes. And they don&#039;t want any applications that they don&#039;t provide mucking up their phones. You don&#039;t buy a Mac because it is cheap. You buy it because you can afford the best. The Mac has never marketed itself as the cheapest - only the easiest to use and the best. So if you can afford an i-phone you can afford a few extra dollars to buy a ring tone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who said buying anything by Apple is the cheapest &#8211; Apple is a premium product. Like a Mercedes. And they don&#039;t want any applications that they don&#039;t provide mucking up their phones. You don&#039;t buy a Mac because it is cheap. You buy it because you can afford the best. The Mac has never marketed itself as the cheapest &#8211; only the easiest to use and the best. So if you can afford an i-phone you can afford a few extra dollars to buy a ring tone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big D, Mtn. View, CA</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/11/04/apple-set-to-disable-iphone-apps-again/#comment-7229</link>
		<dc:creator>Big D, Mtn. View, CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 02:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/11/04/apple-set-to-disable-iphone-apps-again/#comment-7229</guid>
		<description>Then fine, Tony. Modify your iPhone to your heart&#039;s delight. Why not remove ALL of Apple&#039;s software and create your own. It&#039;s your iPhone, so have at it. But I&#039;m going to go out on a limb here and guess that you STILL want to be able to use Apple software/UI, right?



Why not expend all of your efforts and load your iPhone with Windows Mobile Media? It should be a thing of beauty. You sound like a PC kind of guy. You and Steve Ballmer deserve one another.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then fine, Tony. Modify your iPhone to your heart&#039;s delight. Why not remove ALL of Apple&#039;s software and create your own. It&#039;s your iPhone, so have at it. But I&#039;m going to go out on a limb here and guess that you STILL want to be able to use Apple software/UI, right?</p>
<p>Why not expend all of your efforts and load your iPhone with Windows Mobile Media? It should be a thing of beauty. You sound like a PC kind of guy. You and Steve Ballmer deserve one another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave. Victoria. BC.</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/11/04/apple-set-to-disable-iphone-apps-again/#comment-7228</link>
		<dc:creator>dave. Victoria. BC.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 19:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/11/04/apple-set-to-disable-iphone-apps-again/#comment-7228</guid>
		<description>Windows users keep crowing about Marketshare as if it is the greatest thing of all.



1)Ford Excels have greater markert share than Lamborghinis. I&#039;ll rather have a lamborghini.



2) The only reason Windows has greater market share is that it ran on cheap clones. But because of this Windows has all kinds of horrible compatibility issues. Today windows price advantage is shrinking because apple with intel is competitive on pricing.



3) Because Apple has smaller market share it can grow faster now. Apple can Double, can Windows?



Apple one year return 138%.

Microsoft 39%



As an investor you would have made a lot more money on Apple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Windows users keep crowing about Marketshare as if it is the greatest thing of all.</p>
<p>1)Ford Excels have greater markert share than Lamborghinis. I&#039;ll rather have a lamborghini.</p>
<p>2) The only reason Windows has greater market share is that it ran on cheap clones. But because of this Windows has all kinds of horrible compatibility issues. Today windows price advantage is shrinking because apple with intel is competitive on pricing.</p>
<p>3) Because Apple has smaller market share it can grow faster now. Apple can Double, can Windows?</p>
<p>Apple one year return 138%.</p>
<p>Microsoft 39%</p>
<p>As an investor you would have made a lot more money on Apple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen, Austin, Texas</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/11/04/apple-set-to-disable-iphone-apps-again/#comment-7227</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen, Austin, Texas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 18:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/11/04/apple-set-to-disable-iphone-apps-again/#comment-7227</guid>
		<description>Microsoft market share 344 Billion.  OS Market share 90%.

Apple market share 163 Billion. OS Market share 8%.  Who is the genius now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft market share 344 Billion.  OS Market share 90%.</p>
<p>Apple market share 163 Billion. OS Market share 8%.  Who is the genius now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike, San Antonio, TX</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/11/04/apple-set-to-disable-iphone-apps-again/#comment-7226</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike, San Antonio, TX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 18:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/11/04/apple-set-to-disable-iphone-apps-again/#comment-7226</guid>
		<description>Apple is opening themselves to another suit in the UK.  I&#039;m not sure what the UK laws are, but in the US it is illegal for a manufacturer to disable a product that no longer belongs to them to block different 3rd parties.  It would be like HP and Microsoft deciding to disable my computer if I decide to partiton my hard drive and put Linux on it.  My warrantee would be void, but I would sue if my $1000 computer was rendered inoperable for doing it.



Europe tends to be more finicky about antitrust laws than the US.  They&#039;re going to get burned over this within the next year. Sooner or later, they&#039;ll learn from this.  Apple is too good of a company to allow things like this to tarnish their image.



Right now, they&#039;re in a perfect position to put their MAC OSx on the open market.  If they do, they would probably take 10-20% market share away from MS win a year.  Microsoft will always have the edge in the commercial market, but Apple could easily own the consumer and multimedia market.



If Apple wants to keep bugs out of their products, the most ethical thing to do is to make and enforce high standards from software and hardware vendors.  When you exploit your smart consumers for the &quot;greater good,&quot; you only lose your smart consumers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple is opening themselves to another suit in the UK.  I&#039;m not sure what the UK laws are, but in the US it is illegal for a manufacturer to disable a product that no longer belongs to them to block different 3rd parties.  It would be like HP and Microsoft deciding to disable my computer if I decide to partiton my hard drive and put Linux on it.  My warrantee would be void, but I would sue if my $1000 computer was rendered inoperable for doing it.</p>
<p>Europe tends to be more finicky about antitrust laws than the US.  They&#039;re going to get burned over this within the next year. Sooner or later, they&#039;ll learn from this.  Apple is too good of a company to allow things like this to tarnish their image.</p>
<p>Right now, they&#039;re in a perfect position to put their MAC OSx on the open market.  If they do, they would probably take 10-20% market share away from MS win a year.  Microsoft will always have the edge in the commercial market, but Apple could easily own the consumer and multimedia market.</p>
<p>If Apple wants to keep bugs out of their products, the most ethical thing to do is to make and enforce high standards from software and hardware vendors.  When you exploit your smart consumers for the &#034;greater good,&#034; you only lose your smart consumers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Levin Hudson, NH</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/11/04/apple-set-to-disable-iphone-apps-again/#comment-7225</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Levin Hudson, NH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 16:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/11/04/apple-set-to-disable-iphone-apps-again/#comment-7225</guid>
		<description>Way back when, Apple closed its OS, Microsoft opened its OS and the result was a 90% market share for Windows and a paltry 8% market share for Apple.  So what did Jobs learn from this experience?  Apparently, absolutely nothing.  Instead of opening up and allowing 3rd party development to flourish, thereby making IPhone the defacto standard, Jobs repeats his past mistakes and and closes down again.  Why is it that a regular guy like me sees this and a genius like Jobs does not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way back when, Apple closed its OS, Microsoft opened its OS and the result was a 90% market share for Windows and a paltry 8% market share for Apple.  So what did Jobs learn from this experience?  Apparently, absolutely nothing.  Instead of opening up and allowing 3rd party development to flourish, thereby making IPhone the defacto standard, Jobs repeats his past mistakes and and closes down again.  Why is it that a regular guy like me sees this and a genius like Jobs does not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tv, st. louis, mo</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/11/04/apple-set-to-disable-iphone-apps-again/#comment-7224</link>
		<dc:creator>tv, st. louis, mo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 15:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/11/04/apple-set-to-disable-iphone-apps-again/#comment-7224</guid>
		<description>so much apple defense. what a pity.



i see more childish, if not drone quality retorts from the people defending apple and at&amp;t then the people crticizing.



let&#039;s start with the tiff exploit: updating and fixing this exploit would have absolutely no impact on third party applications (who the hell uses tiff anymore, aside screenprinters? i&#039;m a graphic designer, i see maybe half a dozen tiff images a year, and they come from clients with equipment that&#039;s about 10 years outdated) so, really, let&#039;s stop blinding ourselves so willingly as to why and what.



the update, whether the tiff is a subversion, a ruse, or just an also-ran meant to validate this &#039;update&#039; (microsoft&#039;s done similar stunts on patch tuesdays) also.. is shifty. no one does a point release for one single fix. no one. this update better be loaded for there to be a point release justification.



someone already covered it. follow the money. at&amp;t has contracts with apple that include plans for profiting off 3rd party applications, not letting people develop and install them of their own accord. (comparative common application: mozilla firefox, with its freely developed and dispersed extensions.)



expect to pay money for your 3rd party applications, becuase really folks.. steve jobs is just out to job you ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so much apple defense. what a pity.</p>
<p>i see more childish, if not drone quality retorts from the people defending apple and at&amp;t then the people crticizing.</p>
<p>let&#039;s start with the tiff exploit: updating and fixing this exploit would have absolutely no impact on third party applications (who the hell uses tiff anymore, aside screenprinters? i&#039;m a graphic designer, i see maybe half a dozen tiff images a year, and they come from clients with equipment that&#039;s about 10 years outdated) so, really, let&#039;s stop blinding ourselves so willingly as to why and what.</p>
<p>the update, whether the tiff is a subversion, a ruse, or just an also-ran meant to validate this &#039;update&#039; (microsoft&#039;s done similar stunts on patch tuesdays) also.. is shifty. no one does a point release for one single fix. no one. this update better be loaded for there to be a point release justification.</p>
<p>someone already covered it. follow the money. at&amp;t has contracts with apple that include plans for profiting off 3rd party applications, not letting people develop and install them of their own accord. (comparative common application: mozilla firefox, with its freely developed and dispersed extensions.)</p>
<p>expect to pay money for your 3rd party applications, becuase really folks.. steve jobs is just out to job you <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P.Blake Las Vegas, NV.</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/11/04/apple-set-to-disable-iphone-apps-again/#comment-7223</link>
		<dc:creator>P.Blake Las Vegas, NV.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 14:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/11/04/apple-set-to-disable-iphone-apps-again/#comment-7223</guid>
		<description>When you break the &quot;seal&quot; on any product it voids the warranty. When you sign an agreement and break it. That says a lot about you as a person, namely that you have poor character and bad judgement. Hackers hack because they have ego and self-esteem issues. Also because they have no life. Get a life for crying out loud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you break the &#034;seal&#034; on any product it voids the warranty. When you sign an agreement and break it. That says a lot about you as a person, namely that you have poor character and bad judgement. Hackers hack because they have ego and self-esteem issues. Also because they have no life. Get a life for crying out loud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry L, San Ramon, CA</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/11/04/apple-set-to-disable-iphone-apps-again/#comment-7222</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry L, San Ramon, CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 07:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/11/04/apple-set-to-disable-iphone-apps-again/#comment-7222</guid>
		<description>This is pretty pathetic.  Nobody is forcing you to upgrade to newer firmware.  If you want to keep your third party apps, don&#039;t upgrade to 1.1.2 when it becomes available.  Why in the world would Apple expend engineering resources trying to test whether random third party hacks are going to be affected by a software upgrade?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is pretty pathetic.  Nobody is forcing you to upgrade to newer firmware.  If you want to keep your third party apps, don&#039;t upgrade to 1.1.2 when it becomes available.  Why in the world would Apple expend engineering resources trying to test whether random third party hacks are going to be affected by a software upgrade?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John, SF, CA</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/11/04/apple-set-to-disable-iphone-apps-again/#comment-7221</link>
		<dc:creator>John, SF, CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 06:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/11/04/apple-set-to-disable-iphone-apps-again/#comment-7221</guid>
		<description>The WORST thing about the iPhone, is that you CAN NOT put it under a business account. Even though the retail guy told me I could. So if you already have a &quot;personal&quot; cell, and you wanted one for business....nope. Just got off the phone with AT&amp;T about that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The WORST thing about the iPhone, is that you CAN NOT put it under a business account. Even though the retail guy told me I could. So if you already have a &#034;personal&#034; cell, and you wanted one for business&#8230;.nope. Just got off the phone with AT&amp;T about that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
