<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#039;s Microsoft vs. Cisco for the future of the office phone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/10/16/its-microsoft-vs-cisco-for-the-future-of-the-office-phone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/10/16/its-microsoft-vs-cisco-for-the-future-of-the-office-phone/</link>
	<description>Fortune&#039;s tech team offers analysis and perspective on the world’s most important developments.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 03:43:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ian, Ontario</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/10/16/its-microsoft-vs-cisco-for-the-future-of-the-office-phone/#comment-3524</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian, Ontario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 18:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/10/16/its-microsoft-vs-cisco-for-the-future-of-the-office-phone/#comment-3524</guid>
		<description>Microsoft has a good product they just forgot about a few key business drivers! They better learn from leading vendors like CISCO and offer a hardware component to the solution (ip phone) because people are going to be pissed if they need to call for support on their computer and they can&#039;t because the computer is toast!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft has a good product they just forgot about a few key business drivers! They better learn from leading vendors like CISCO and offer a hardware component to the solution (ip phone) because people are going to be pissed if they need to call for support on their computer and they can&#039;t because the computer is toast!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John D Houston Texas</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/10/16/its-microsoft-vs-cisco-for-the-future-of-the-office-phone/#comment-3523</link>
		<dc:creator>John D Houston Texas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 21:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/10/16/its-microsoft-vs-cisco-for-the-future-of-the-office-phone/#comment-3523</guid>
		<description>Can I run Phone Software on an Apple to more reliable? I just spent the last 4 days with my Microsoft Windows XP computer at 100% CPU for some reason. I would hate to rely on Microsoft for Software to run my phone system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can I run Phone Software on an Apple to more reliable? I just spent the last 4 days with my Microsoft Windows XP computer at 100% CPU for some reason. I would hate to rely on Microsoft for Software to run my phone system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bizness Guru, Philadelphia, PA</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/10/16/its-microsoft-vs-cisco-for-the-future-of-the-office-phone/#comment-3511</link>
		<dc:creator>Bizness Guru, Philadelphia, PA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/10/16/its-microsoft-vs-cisco-for-the-future-of-the-office-phone/#comment-3511</guid>
		<description>Responding to the comment of Nick, Redmond, WA.

It would be interestingly funny if their new solution offers us to set various Online Statuses - just like the IM clients if you don&#039;t want to be reached. The other thing they should possibly do is provide &#039;Stealth Settings&#039; for you to be offline (invisible) to selected contacts, eg. your boss after 5 pm.

(http://thebizshow.wordpress.com)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Responding to the comment of Nick, Redmond, WA.</p>
<p>It would be interestingly funny if their new solution offers us to set various Online Statuses &#8211; just like the IM clients if you don&#039;t want to be reached. The other thing they should possibly do is provide &#039;Stealth Settings&#039; for you to be offline (invisible) to selected contacts, eg. your boss after 5 pm.</p>
<p>(<a href="http://thebizshow.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://thebizshow.wordpress.com</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Austin, TX</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/10/16/its-microsoft-vs-cisco-for-the-future-of-the-office-phone/#comment-3521</link>
		<dc:creator>Austin, TX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 21:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/10/16/its-microsoft-vs-cisco-for-the-future-of-the-office-phone/#comment-3521</guid>
		<description>How does the blue screen of death &quot;sound&quot; ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does the blue screen of death &#034;sound&#034; ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tobi, Arlington, VA</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/10/16/its-microsoft-vs-cisco-for-the-future-of-the-office-phone/#comment-3520</link>
		<dc:creator>Tobi, Arlington, VA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 19:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/10/16/its-microsoft-vs-cisco-for-the-future-of-the-office-phone/#comment-3520</guid>
		<description>I love that two people from Redmond, WA have posted.  I have a feeling at least one of them has an inside scoop....



jf: Assuming they really are from Redmond. They might be fibbing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love that two people from Redmond, WA have posted.  I have a feeling at least one of them has an inside scoop&#8230;.</p>
<p>jf: Assuming they really are from Redmond. They might be fibbing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: samtech, new york, ny</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/10/16/its-microsoft-vs-cisco-for-the-future-of-the-office-phone/#comment-3522</link>
		<dc:creator>samtech, new york, ny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/10/16/its-microsoft-vs-cisco-for-the-future-of-the-office-phone/#comment-3522</guid>
		<description>Unified communications is a great concept that has already been implemented by many telecommunications companies. I&#039;m a subscriber to one, PhoneFusion.com, and it easily integrates with Microsoft Outlook.



Microsoft needs to keep up with other companies that have already added unified communication software to their products.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unified communications is a great concept that has already been implemented by many telecommunications companies. I&#039;m a subscriber to one, PhoneFusion.com, and it easily integrates with Microsoft Outlook.</p>
<p>Microsoft needs to keep up with other companies that have already added unified communication software to their products.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Buffalo, NY</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/10/16/its-microsoft-vs-cisco-for-the-future-of-the-office-phone/#comment-3519</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Buffalo, NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 15:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/10/16/its-microsoft-vs-cisco-for-the-future-of-the-office-phone/#comment-3519</guid>
		<description>Sure what a great idea, now I can have a phone system that crashes along with my OS, way to go MSFT, Great idea!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure what a great idea, now I can have a phone system that crashes along with my OS, way to go MSFT, Great idea!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris, Berkeley, CA</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/10/16/its-microsoft-vs-cisco-for-the-future-of-the-office-phone/#comment-3518</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris, Berkeley, CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 03:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/10/16/its-microsoft-vs-cisco-for-the-future-of-the-office-phone/#comment-3518</guid>
		<description>Yeah right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig, Glendale, CA</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/10/16/its-microsoft-vs-cisco-for-the-future-of-the-office-phone/#comment-3517</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig, Glendale, CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 00:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/10/16/its-microsoft-vs-cisco-for-the-future-of-the-office-phone/#comment-3517</guid>
		<description>I was hoping for a fix for &quot;e-mail hell&quot; first.  Wouldn&#039;t that be nice?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was hoping for a fix for &#034;e-mail hell&#034; first.  Wouldn&#039;t that be nice?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chicago, IL</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/10/16/its-microsoft-vs-cisco-for-the-future-of-the-office-phone/#comment-3516</link>
		<dc:creator>Chicago, IL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 23:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/10/16/its-microsoft-vs-cisco-for-the-future-of-the-office-phone/#comment-3516</guid>
		<description>Microsoft should learn to answer the phone itself when it&#039;s customers call in for help before it claims it can help the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft should learn to answer the phone itself when it&#039;s customers call in for help before it claims it can help the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
