Big Tech

Covering the digital giants

It's Microsoft vs. Cisco for the future of the office phone


Bill Gates
Photo: Microsoft. Chairman Bill Gates takes the stage for the company's most important announcements.

Microsoft (MSFT) Chairman Bill Gates on Tuesday kicked off the software giant’s campaign to reinvent the office phone – an ambitious strategy that could be a multi-billion-dollar business for Microsoft, and that will almost certainly lead to a showdown with fellow tech titan Cisco Systems (CSCO).

In Gates’s vision of the future, common annoyances like phone tag and voicemail hell will be eliminated, thanks to software that can tell you when people are available and how best to reach them. In the first real step toward making that vision a reality, Gates launched a family of products that build voice calling and other capabilities into everyday business software.

Gates's gamble

It’s a huge bet, even for a company the size of Microsoft. Practically every business in the world uses a phone – and if Microsoft can make its software an important part of how those phones work, it stands to make a lot of money.

To improve its chances of getting a big payoff, Microsoft is offering tools to help other software companies build advanced communication features into their programs. It is also partnering with companies such as Nortel Networks (NT) and Ayaya (AV) that already provide business phone services. The result, Gates said, will be an explosion of innovation reminiscent of what happened in the PC industry decades ago. Business calling, Gates says, “has been its own world, not touched by the magic of software.”

And really, the Microsoft launch is about more than phone calls. The new software aims to make it easier for people to contact each other and get work done, offering features such as instant messaging tied seamlessly into e-mail, and video conferencing that can be set up by simply clicking and dragging a contact’s name into the right box.

Competition from Cisco

However nifty it all sounds, others won’t sit back and let Microsoft define the future of business communication. Microsoft’s most notable rival might be Cisco. Cisco argues that its networking equipment, not Microsoft’s software, will be the key component that makes business calls and video conferencing more affordable and convenient. (At the same time, the two companies are promising to make their products compatible, for the sake of customers.)

Cisco has important strengths that could allow it to foil Microsoft’s plans for dominance. For starters, Cisco is the leading provider of the gear companies use to move data through their networks – and it’s already an important provider of Internet-based calling services. It has also worked to develop partners who help customers use the equipment.

Still, Microsoft has its Exchange Server software for managing e-mail and other types of messaging, which is already a mainstay of office communication. It also has Office, which includes productivity software including Word, Excel and Outlook. By linking its phone strategy into those programs, which already have loyal customers, Microsoft hopes to get a quick foothold in the market.

A growth market

No matter who wins, both companies would agree that the opportunity is huge. And they also agree that more likely than not, technology will soon transform business calls from the closed model of dedicated lines and specialized equipment into the more open model of Internet-based calls managed by standard network equipment and software.

As an example of the financial benefits of switching to its technology, Microsoft highlighted a study it commissioned from Forrester Consulting. The study estimates that over a three-year period, a company could save $5 for every $1 it invests in moving to Microsoft’s unified communications model.

But those numbers come with a few catches. That 500 percent return on investment assumes companies completely upgrade to Microsoft’s recommended equipment. It also assumes that customers spend $2.1 million on software, and $4.7 million on equipment and training – a number that some IT workers might argue is a little low. And the lion’s share of the savings assume workers are far more productive, travel less, and get work done faster than they would otherwise.

Though the financial benefits might not be clear yet for every customer, early reaction is positive, Microsoft says. The company already has about 300,000 users licensed to use the software, and the feedback from customers has been positive.

Gurdeep Pall, the corporate vice president who leads Microsoft’s Unified Communications group, said Microsoft expects the adoption of Office Communications Server to happen at least as quickly as the adoption of Microsoft Exchange did – “and we have early data points to support that,” he said. And he says universal headaches that have developed names like “phone tag” and “voicemail jail” are proof that office workers are eager for a better way.

For more on Microsoft's strategy, click below to hear part of Jon Fortt's interview with Gurdeep Pall, corporate vice president for Microsoft's Unified Communications group.

Microsoft has a good product they just forgot about a few key business drivers! They better learn from leading vendors like CISCO and offer a hardware component to the solution (ip phone) because people are going to be pissed if they need to call for support on their computer and they can't because the computer is toast!

Posted By Ian, Ontario: November 23, 2007 1:27 PM

Can I run Phone Software on an Apple to more reliable? I just spent the last 4 days with my Microsoft Windows XP computer at 100% CPU for some reason. I would hate to rely on Microsoft for Software to run my phone system.

Posted By John D Houston Texas: October 18, 2007 5:43 PM

Responding to the comment of Nick, Redmond, WA.

It would be interestingly funny if their new solution offers us to set various Online Statuses – just like the IM clients if you don't want to be reached. The other thing they should possibly do is provide 'Stealth Settings' for you to be offline (invisible) to selected contacts, eg. your boss after 5 pm.

(http://thebizshow.wordpress.com)

Posted By Bizness Guru, Philadelphia, PA: October 18, 2007 11:18 AM

How does the blue screen of death "sound" ?

Posted By Austin, TX: October 17, 2007 5:55 PM

I love that two people from Redmond, WA have posted. I have a feeling at least one of them has an inside scoop….

jf: Assuming they really are from Redmond. They might be fibbing.

Posted By Tobi, Arlington, VA: October 17, 2007 3:17 PM

Unified communications is a great concept that has already been implemented by many telecommunications companies. I'm a subscriber to one, PhoneFusion.com, and it easily integrates with Microsoft Outlook.

Microsoft needs to keep up with other companies that have already added unified communication software to their products.

Posted By samtech, new york, ny: October 17, 2007 12:58 PM

Sure what a great idea, now I can have a phone system that crashes along with my OS, way to go MSFT, Great idea!

Posted By Joe Buffalo, NY: October 17, 2007 11:09 AM

Yeah right.

Posted By Chris, Berkeley, CA: October 16, 2007 11:50 PM

I was hoping for a fix for "e-mail hell" first. Wouldn't that be nice?

Posted By Craig, Glendale, CA: October 16, 2007 8:54 PM

Microsoft should learn to answer the phone itself when it's customers call in for help before it claims it can help the world.

Posted By Chicago, IL: October 16, 2007 7:22 PM

I couldn't think of a more perfect reason to have the phone in my office removed.

Posted By Dave, Yonkers, NY: October 16, 2007 7:11 PM

Maybe people don't want to be reached all the time…

Posted By Nick, Redmond, WA: October 16, 2007 6:18 PM

Microsoft could start with their own corporate phone system. After my XP MCE to Vista upgrade was canceled for no reason and I endured endless phone tree dead ends and circles I only finally got a results by calling the MS Corporate switchboard and tried to get Investor Relations. I have never been so furious in all my life over a phone system.

Posted By Computer Bob: October 16, 2007 6:10 PM

Microsoft has been trying to get into this market forever, and their employees have had these features on their desktop phones/PCs for years.

So why hasn't Microsoft been able to ship this externally? Because Microsoft, while being great at *thinking up* product ideas, is abysmal at *shipping them into the real world*. Product development gets stuck in the ridiculous bureaucratic quagmires that the Office and Windows teams have become.

Posted By Larry, Redmond, WA: October 16, 2007 5:43 PM
CNNMoney.com Comment Policy: CNNMoney.com encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNNMoney.com may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNNMoney.com the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNNMoney.com Privacy Statement.
Jon fortt

Jon Fortt
A senior writer for Fortune, Jon Fortt focuses on technology and innovation in Silicon Valley – a subject he's been reporting on since his days as a rookie reporter for the Lexington (Ky.) Herald-Leader. Before joining Fortune in 2007, Jon had reporting and editing stints at Business 2.0 magazine, and the San Jose (Calif.) Mercury News, Silicon Valley's hometown newspaper.
Subscribe to Big Tech: RSS feed | email newsletter
* : Time reflects local markets trading time.† - Intraday data delayed 15 minutes for Nasdaq, and 20 minutes for other exchanges.• Disclaimer
Powered by WordPress.com VIP.