<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New iPod nano: up close (Photos 1/5)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/09/05/new-ipod-nano-up-close-photos-15/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/09/05/new-ipod-nano-up-close-photos-15/</link>
	<description>Fortune&#039;s tech team offers analysis and perspective on the world’s most important developments.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 03:43:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: AppleJack</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/09/05/new-ipod-nano-up-close-photos-15/#comment-3388</link>
		<dc:creator>AppleJack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigtech.wordpress.com/2007/09/05/new-ipod-nano-up-close-photos-15/#comment-3388</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t like the new Nano&#039;s design - Short, stubby and ugly where the &quot;old&quot; nano was Long, thin and sexy.

Maybe it will grow on me but adding a small video screen at the expense of design and useability seems a poor trade.  If you need video - get one of the other IPods but leave the Nano as a purpose-built music machines.  Am I off base here?  Is this as obvious an attempt to sell more video at ITunes as it appears?  /AppleJack</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t like the new Nano&#039;s design &#8211; Short, stubby and ugly where the &#034;old&#034; nano was Long, thin and sexy.</p>
<p>Maybe it will grow on me but adding a small video screen at the expense of design and useability seems a poor trade.  If you need video &#8211; get one of the other IPods but leave the Nano as a purpose-built music machines.  Am I off base here?  Is this as obvious an attempt to sell more video at ITunes as it appears?  /AppleJack</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arun</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/09/05/new-ipod-nano-up-close-photos-15/#comment-3387</link>
		<dc:creator>arun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 02:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigtech.wordpress.com/2007/09/05/new-ipod-nano-up-close-photos-15/#comment-3387</guid>
		<description>product is good and definitely better than the old apple nano...but they have to ramp up othetr products too...
no one knows nokia s move ...but i guess WIFI future in India is good enough...
For people wanting to check wifi places in India Visit &lt;a href=&quot;http://birlaa.com/2007/09/03/allotment-status-for-power-grid-ipo-power-grid-listing/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://birlaa.com/2007/09/03/allotment-status-for-power-grid-ipo-power-grid-listing/&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>product is good and definitely better than the old apple nano&#8230;but they have to ramp up othetr products too&#8230;<br />
no one knows nokia s move &#8230;but i guess WIFI future in India is good enough&#8230;<br />
For people wanting to check wifi places in India Visit <a href="http://birlaa.com/2007/09/03/allotment-status-for-power-grid-ipo-power-grid-listing/" rel="nofollow">http://birlaa.com/2007/09/03/allotment-status-for-power-grid-ipo-power-grid-listing/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa Schapiro</title>
		<link>http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/09/05/new-ipod-nano-up-close-photos-15/#comment-3386</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Schapiro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 18:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigtech.wordpress.com/2007/09/05/new-ipod-nano-up-close-photos-15/#comment-3386</guid>
		<description>I love aapl and products.  I think you should have more customizes Iphones like Fashion TV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love aapl and products.  I think you should have more customizes Iphones like Fashion TV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
