Big Tech

Covering the digital giants

A better, cheaper nano: Apple's holiday gift to itself


I just love folks who enjoy cracking stuff open and seeing how it works – and iSuppli is at it again. The research firm has published the results of a "tear-down" of the iPod nano, which basically means they took the thing apart, spread its guts out on a table, and tallied up the cost of the pieces.

What iSuppli found should send shivers down the spines of competitors like SanDisk, Creative and iRiver, who have already been lapped by the iPod in the audio player race: Apple Computer has figured out how to build the second-generation nano at a lower cost than the first. Since Apple's positioning the new nano as the must-have gadget of the holiday season, Apple's efficiency amounts to a big Christmas gift to itself.

The cost of the parts in the $199, 4-gigabyte nano is $72.24, said Andrew Rassweiler, teardown services manager and senior analyst for iSuppli; that's $17.73 less than the original iPod's $89.97 bill of materials price tag.

A big reason for the difference? Apple's getting cozier and cozier with Samsung, the world's largest producer of flash memory and the supplier of much of the flash storage for the nano. In this latest iteration, Apple has added a Samsung-made system-on-chip that replaces the PortalPlayer innards from the first generation. Apple's savings from the move: about $2.60 per iPod, or $5.40 rather than $8. Doesn't sound like much, but when you consider the millions of iPods that sell, and note that every dollar in saved component costs pretty much goes straight to Apple's bottom line, you start to see the money stacking up in Cupertino.

Interestingly, iSuppli did a teardown of the regular iPod and found that it's pretty much the same as the pervious version, with the addition of a brighter display. That suggests to me that Apple expects the iPod nano to be the big hero of the holiday season, since its $149 starting price point is right in the sweet spot of what trendy folks will pay on an impulse.

CNNMoney.com Comment Policy: CNNMoney.com encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNNMoney.com may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNNMoney.com the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNNMoney.com Privacy Statement.
Jon fortt

Jon Fortt
A senior writer for Fortune, Jon Fortt focuses on technology and innovation in Silicon Valley – a subject he's been reporting on since his days as a rookie reporter for the Lexington (Ky.) Herald-Leader. Before joining Fortune in 2007, Jon had reporting and editing stints at Business 2.0 magazine, and the San Jose (Calif.) Mercury News, Silicon Valley's hometown newspaper.
Subscribe to Big Tech: RSS feed | email newsletter
* : Time reflects local markets trading time.† - Intraday data delayed 15 minutes for Nasdaq, and 20 minutes for other exchanges.• Disclaimer
Powered by WordPress.com VIP.